§Why CasetextPricing

BUTLER

Non-Title Respondent, Board of Parole Hearings, Response to Amicus Curiae Brief

3 Cited authorities

  1. In re Dannenberg

    34 Cal.4th 1061 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 650 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a California prisoner has no right to a release date prior to being deemed suitable for parole because state law does not provide such a right

  2. In re Rodriguez

    14 Cal.3d 639 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 179 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding sentence was cruel and unusual punishment where defendant had served 22 years for a nonviolent act of child molestation

  3. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or