Rowland v. Christian
69 Cal.2d 108 (Cal. 1968) Cited 1,244 times 20 Legal AnalysesHolding that Section 1714 superceded prior common-law negligence rules
C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District
53 Cal.4th 861 (Cal. 2012) Cited 199 times 3 Legal AnalysesFinding that supervisory personnel could be vicariously liable and noting that "public school personnel may be individually liable for their negligent failure to protect students from harm at others' hands"
John R. v. Oakland Unified School Dist.
48 Cal.3d 438 (Cal. 1989) Cited 242 timesHolding that individual instances of sexual harassment of students by teachers does not impute liability to the school districts under the doctrine of respondeat superior
Thompson v. Alameda County
27 Cal.3d 741 (Cal. 1980) Cited 301 timesHolding that, under Tarasoff, a duty runs only to "readily identifiable" third parties
Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice
Cal. R. 8.520 Cited 3,146 times(a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or