§Why CasetextPricing

RAND RESOURCES v. CITY OF CARSON

Appellants’ Answer to Petition for Review

8 Cited authorities

  1. Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port Dist.

    106 Cal.App.4th 1219 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 272 times
    Finding claims within the ambit of subdivision (e) where they arose from "communications to either the City or Lennar involving the proposed development of Crystal Bay and other bayfront property"

  2. Rivero v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio

    105 Cal.App.4th 913 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 248 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding reports that supervisor terminated after union members complained of his activities was not a discussion of policies against unlawful workplace activities

  3. Wang v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust

    153 Cal.App.4th 790 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 131 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that anti-SLAPP did not apply to a claim for breach of contract because "[t]he overall thrust of the complaint challenge[d] the manner in which the parties privately dealt with one another, on both contractual and tort theories, and d[id] not principally challenge the collateral activity of pursuing governmental approvals."

  4. Graffiti Protective Coatings, Inc. v. City of Pico Rivera

    181 Cal.App.4th 1207 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that plaintiff's allegations that city violated competitive bidding laws was based on city's decision to forgo bidding process altogether, not city officials' protected deliberations regarding the bids

  5. Commonwealth Energy v. Investor Data Exchange

    110 Cal.App.4th 26 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 98 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the challenged speech was not "being made in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest " and therefore not protected by the anti-SLAPP statute

  6. Consumer Justice Center v. Trimedica International, Inc.

    107 Cal.App.4th 595 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 77 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff had reasonable probability of proving statements about efficacy of product were false where statements "not supported by any reliable scientific proof"

  7. Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange, Inc. v. County of El Dorado

    200 Cal.App.4th 1470 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 42 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Taking judicial notice of articles of incorporation filed with California Secretary of State on appellate court's own motion

  8. Section 425.16 - California anti-SLAPP law

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16   Cited 2,816 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Reversing district court's denial of anti-SLAPP motion as moot and remanding for consideration of the motion, including attorney's fees