49 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Mitchell

    26 Cal.4th 181 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 2,465 times
    Noting that a certified abstract of judgment "constitutes the commitment" and serves as "the process and authority for carrying the judgment and sentence into effect"
  2. People v. Rivera

    233 Cal.App.4th 1085 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 1,043 times
    Noting Proposition 47 became effective in November 2014
  3. People v. Superior Court (Alvarez)

    14 Cal.4th 968 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 1,374 times
    Holding that a trial court's discretion under Cal.Penal Code § 17(b) to reduce a "wobbler" offense is not eliminated by the Three Strikes law but is reviewable
  4. Department of Revenue v. ACF Industries, Inc.

    510 U.S. 332 (1994)   Cited 225 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding railroads could not challenge as discriminatory a generally applicable property tax to which some non-railroad property, but not railroad property, was exempted
  5. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment Housing Com

    43 Cal.3d 1379 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 888 times
    Holding that the statute did not extend to cover remedies that were “different in kind from the enumerated remedies,” because “ more reasonable reading of the phrase ‘including, but not limited to,’ ... permitting only additional corrective remedies comports with the statutory construction doctrines of ejusdem generis, expressio unius est exclusio alterius and noscitur a sociis.”
  6. People v. Saunders

    5 Cal.4th 580 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 670 times
    Detailing California approach, since 1874, of permitting stipulation and, more recently, of also permitting bifurcation
  7. People v. Avery

    27 Cal.4th 49 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 377 times
    Allowing courts to look to the entire record of conviction to determine whether the out-of-state conduct constitutes a "serious felony" under Three Strikes
  8. People v. Superior Court (Pearson)

    48 Cal.4th 564 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 238 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting district attorney's argument that "the Legislature's use of the word ‘defendant’ rather than ‘petitioner’ in section 1054.9," demonstrated that the Legislature was not "creat[ing] discovery in a separate habeas corpus matter"
  9. People v. Jones

    25 Cal.4th 98 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 278 times
    Holding that defendant should have received a single life sentence—as opposed to three consecutive sentences—for vaginally and anally raping victim and forcing her to orally copulate him in the backseat of a car during the span of one-and-a-half hours
  10. People v. Cruz

    13 Cal.4th 764 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 287 times
    Holding that burglary of an inhabited vessel constituted burglary of "an inhabited dwelling house"
  11. Section 10

    Cal. Const. art. II § 10   Cited 799 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Forbidding the Legislature from amending enactments made by voter initiative if the amendments are inconsistent with said initiative