Sosinsky v. Grant
6 Cal.App.4th 1548 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992) Cited 191 timesHolding it improper to take judicial notice of the truth of a court's factual findings where principles of res judicata or collateral estoppel do not apply
Bianka M. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.
245 Cal.App.4th 406 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) Cited 1 timesB267454 03-02-2016 BIANKA M., a Minor, etc., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Gladys M., Real Party in Interest. Irell & Manella, Joshua C. Lee, Los Angeles, Stephen A. Rossi, Newport Beach and Meiqiang Cui, Los Angeles; Public Counsel and Nickole G. Miller, for Petitioner, Bianka M. No appearance for Respondent. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Julian W. Poon, Eric A. Westlund, Nathaniel P. Johnson, Los Angeles, Victor Lee, Alameda, Lali Madduri, Los Angeles, Jennifer
Section 452 - Matters permitting judicial notice
Cal. Evid. Code § 452 Cited 7,903 times 1 Legal AnalysesPermitting notice to be taken of the "[o]fficial acts of the . . . judicial departments . . . of any state of the United States"
Section 459 - Duties of reviewing court
Cal. Evid. Code § 459 Cited 4,180 times 1 Legal AnalysesReviewing court must notice matter noticed by trial court
Rule 8.252 - Judicial notice; findings and evidence on appeal
Cal. R. 8.252 Cited 592 times(a)Judicial notice (1) To obtain judicial notice by a reviewing court under Evidence Code section 459, a party must serve and file a separate motion with a proposed order. (2) The motion must state: (A) Why the matter to be noticed is relevant to the appeal; (B) Whether the matter to be noticed was presented to the trial court and, if so, whether judicial notice was taken by that court; (C) If judicial notice of the matter was not taken by the trial court, why the matter is subject to judicial notice