36 Cited authorities

  1. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

    513 U.S. 561 (1995)   Cited 995 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 12 does not apply to secondary market transactions as the statute's inclusion of the term “prospectus” evinces an intent to limit the Sections's scope solely to the initial public offering
  2. Watson v. United States

    552 U.S. 74 (2007)   Cited 302 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a person does not use a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) when he receives it in trade for drugs
  3. Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.

    53 Cal.4th 1004 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 800 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Holding the employer is required to provide a meal period to employees, but "is not obligated to police meal breaks and ensure no work thereafter is performed"
  4. Green v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.

    490 U.S. 504 (1989)   Cited 470 times
    Holding it would be absurd not to apply Fed.R.Evid. 609, which authorizes impeachment of witness's credibility using specified categories of criminal convictions, to civil as well as criminal defendants
  5. Radzanower v. Touche Ross Co.

    426 U.S. 148 (1976)   Cited 509 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding § 78aa did not supersede narrower venue provision in National Bank Act and rejecting amicus SEC's suggestion § 78aa should apply nonetheless to facilitate consolidation of litigation as a “policy argument ... more appropriately addressed to Congress”
  6. Martinez v. Combs

    49 Cal.4th 35 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 478 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California's wage and hour laws do not impose liability on "individual corporate agents acting within the scope of their agency"
  7. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions Inc.

    40 Cal.4th 1094 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 513 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California Labor Code claims have a three-year statute of limitations
  8. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water Co.

    20 Cal.4th 785 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 340 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a court evaluates if an employee was primarily engaged in exempt duties for purposes of the administrative exemption to overtime pay, it must consider "how the employee actually spends his or her time" and also "whether the employee's practice diverges from the employer's realistic expectations"
  9. Morillion v. Royal Packing

    22 Cal.4th 575 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 331 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compulsory travel time on bus from departure point to work site is compensable
  10. Cal. Ex. Rel. Sacramento Metro. Air v. U.S.

    215 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 257 times
    Holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1442 could not support jurisdiction in the face of a jurisdictional bar, on the ground that "[i]t is fundamental that a general statutory provision may not be used to nullify or to trump a specific provision, irrespective of the priority of enactment"
  11. Section 207 - Maximum hours

    29 U.S.C. § 207   Cited 10,430 times   224 Legal Analyses
    Establishing overtime rules
  12. Section 515 - Exemptions for executive, administrative, and professional employees

    Cal. Lab. Code § 515   Cited 215 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Exempting "administrative" employees from overtime compensation; Lab. Code, § 226.7, subd. (e) [providing exemption from meal and rest periods].
  13. Section 541.602 - Salary basis

    29 C.F.R. § 541.602   Cited 399 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Focusing on whether "the employee regularly receives" a "predetermined amount" each relevant pay period
  14. Section 778.114 - Fluctuating Workweek Method of Computing Overtime

    29 C.F.R. § 778.114   Cited 382 times   70 Legal Analyses
    Prescribing total hours, including overtime, as the divisor when employers pay by shift without regard to fluctuating hours
  15. Section 778.108 - The "regular rate"

    29 C.F.R. § 778.108   Cited 116 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Defining the "regular rate" as "the hourly rate actually paid the employee for the normal, nonovertime workweek for which he is employed" (citing Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co., 325 U.S. 419, 424, 65 S.Ct. 1242, 89 L.Ed. 1705 (1945) )
  16. Section 778.211 - Discretionary bonuses

    29 C.F.R. § 778.211   Cited 84 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating 29 C.F.R. § 778.211
  17. Section 778.209 - Method of inclusion of bonus in regular rate

    29 C.F.R. § 778.209   Cited 43 times   22 Legal Analyses

    (a)General rules. Where a bonus payment is considered a part of the regular rate at which an employee is employed, it must be included in computing his regular hourly rate of pay and overtime compensation. No difficulty arises in computing overtime compensation if the bonus covers only one weekly pay period. The amount of the bonus is merely added to the other earnings of the employee (except statutory exclusions) and the total divided by total hours worked. Under many bonus plans, however, calculations

  18. Section 778.208 - Inclusion and exclusion of bonuses in computing the "regular rate."

    29 C.F.R. § 778.208   Cited 39 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Providing that that certain special payments---e.g., "discretionary bonuses, gifts and payments in the nature of gifts on special occasions, contributions by the employer to certain welfare plans and payments made by the employer pursuant to certain profit-sharing, thrift and savings plans"---are not part of the regular rate
  19. Section 778.207 - Other types of contract premium pay distinguished

    29 C.F.R. § 778.207   Cited 39 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that non-overtime premiums for specific hours worked, such as nightshift differentials and hazard pay, must be included in the regular rate
  20. Section 778.502 - Artificially labeling part of the regular wages a "bonus"

    29 C.F.R. § 778.502   Cited 11 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a bonus is a sum paid in "addition to total wages usually because of extra effort of one kind or another, or as a reward for loyal service or as a gift"
  21. Section 778.203 - Premium pay for work on Saturdays, Sundays, and other "special days"

    29 C.F.R. § 778.203   Cited 10 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Reiterating the "extra compensation" standard from the FLSA