§Why CasetextPricing

HECKART v. A-1 SELF STORAGE

Appellant’s Opposition

21 Cited authorities

  1. Perry v. Sindermann

    408 U.S. 593 (1972)   Cited 4,496 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mutually explicit understanding could give rise to protected property interest

  2. Rogers v. Tennessee

    532 U.S. 451 (2001)   Cited 651 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court's abrogation of the common law "year and a day" rule for murder was not a violation of the Ex Post Facto clause

  3. In re Zeth S.

    31 Cal.4th 396 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,550 times
    Explaining how " ‘[t]he dependency scheme is a "remarkable system of checks and balances" ’ "

  4. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization

    19 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 640 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “administrative interpretation ... will be accorded great respect by the courts and will be followed it not clearly erroneous”

  5. People v. Rowland

    4 Cal.4th 238 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 720 times
    In People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 377, 841 P.2d 897, we disapproved the Thompson passage on which he relies.

  6. Carducci v. Regan

    714 F.2d 171 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 486 times
    Holding limited to non-constitutional claims

  7. Claudio v. Regents of University of California

    134 Cal.App.4th 224 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 250 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Claudio, the court found a triable issue as to whether the interactive process broke down when the employer refused to communicate through the employee's attorney at the employee's request.

  8. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.

    51 Cal.4th 524 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 175 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court's ruling that ZIP code information constitutes personal information within the meaning of section 1747.08 applies retrospectively

  9. Brosterhous v. State Bar

    12 Cal.4th 315 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 175 times
    Recognizing "intent of Congress that section 1983 claims be judicially resolved."

  10. Grafton Partners v. Superior Court

    36 Cal.4th 944 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 118 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that right to jury trial may only be waived as prescribed by California legislature and listing methods allowed for such waivers

  11. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. VI § 1   Cited 233 times

    The judicial power of this State is vested in the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts, all of which are courts of record. Cal. Const. art. VI § 1