58 Cited authorities

  1. Faretta v. California

    422 U.S. 806 (1975)   Cited 10,457 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to self-representation
  2. Morrissey v. Brewer

    408 U.S. 471 (1972)   Cited 9,577 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the minimum requirements of due process" in a parole revocation proceeding include "the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses"
  3. In re Gault

    387 U.S. 1 (1967)   Cited 3,948 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that children in juvenile delinquency proceedings have a right to notice of the charges, the right to counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and a right against self-incrimination
  4. People v. Doolin

    45 Cal.4th 390 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 2,605 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding defendant's request to represent himself was untimely where he sought self-representation at sentencing hearing only after his Marsden motion was denied
  5. Medina v. California

    505 U.S. 437 (1992)   Cited 1,062 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Due Process Clause has limited operation beyond the specific guarantees enumerated in the Bill of Rights
  6. Dusky v. United States

    362 U.S. 402 (1960)   Cited 3,448 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the standard for competence to stand trial is whether the defendant has "sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding" and has "a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him."
  7. In re Sheena K

    40 Cal.4th 875 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 1,833 times
    Finding probationer's forfeiture properly disregarded where facially vague and overbroad probation condition could be corrected by inserting a knowledge requirement
  8. Jackson v. Indiana

    406 U.S. 715 (1972)   Cited 1,012 times
    Holding that an incompetent pretrial detainee cannot, after a competency hearing, be held indefinitely without either criminal process or civil commitment; due process requires, at a minimum, some rational relation between the nature and duration of commitment and its purpose
  9. People v. Partida

    37 Cal.4th 428 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 1,178 times
    Finding that defendant may argue on appeal that error in overruling a section 352 objection "had the legal consequence of violating his due process rights"
  10. People v. Welch

    5 Cal.4th 228 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 902 times
    Upholding curfew condition between " 'dark' " and 6:00 a.m.