§Why CasetextPricing

SCHER v. BURKE

Appellants, Richard Erickson, Wendie Malick, Richard Schroder, and Andrea Schroder, Notice of Errata

6 Cited authorities

  1. State ex rel Thornton v. Hay

    254 Or. 584 (Or. 1969)   Cited 47 times
    Holding that public's recreational easement over dry-sand area applies to private property

  2. State Highway v. Fultz

    491 P.2d 1171 (Or. 1972)   Cited 4 times

    Argued September 10, 1971 Affirmed December 22, 1971 Petition for rehearing denied February 23, 1972 IN BANC Appeal from Circuit Court, Tillamook County, J.S. BOHANNON, Judge. AFFIRMED. George P. Winslow, Tillamook, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was C. Ray Johnson, Tillamook. Frank C. McKinney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General; Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General; L.I. Lindas, Assistant

  3. Manhattan Beach v. Cortelyou

    10 Cal.2d 653 (Cal. 1938)   Cited 28 times

    Docket No. L.A. 15772. February 15, 1938. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Elliot Craig, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Clyde Woodworth, City Attorney, and Robert H. Dunlap and George R. Larwill, Special Counsel, for Appellant. O'Melveny, Tuller Myers, Pierce Works, Neil S. McCarthy and Earl L. Banta for Respondents. EDMONDS, J. The City of Manhattan Beach fronts on the Pacific Ocean. Along its westerly boundary lies a strip of

  4. F. A. Hihn Co. v. City of Santa Cruz

    170 Cal. 436 (Cal. 1915)   Cited 20 times
    In F.A. Hahn Co. v. City of Santa Cruz, 170 Cal. 436 [ 150 P. 62], the court said: "The high-water mark which defines the limit of the State sovereignty is the usual or ordinary high-water mark.

  5. City of San Diego v. Hall

    180 Cal. 165 (Cal. 1919)   Cited 13 times
    In City of San Diego v. Hall, 180 Cal. 165 [ 179 P. 889], it was said, `something more than a mere casual user must be shown before any valid dedication will be implied.'... The county did nothing to evidence the fact that any park existed on the site in question.

  6. Whiteman v. City of San Diego

    184 Cal. 163 (Cal. 1920)   Cited 4 times

    L. A. No. 5145. October 19, 1920. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. W.A. Sloane, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Haines Haines for Appellant. Doolittle Morrison, T.B. Cosgrove, City Attorney, and M. R. Thorp, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents. WILBUR, J. This is an action to quiet title of plaintiff to certain property against certain liens for the improvement of Ohio Street, and also to enjoin the issuance of bonds for such assessments