Russello v. United States

Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"

United States v. Rodgers

Holding that § 7403 contemplates "the recognition of third-party interests through the mechanism of judicial valuation and distribution"

People v. Stanley

Upholding admission of evidence of a car arson as an offense that "involved an implied threat of violence against a person"

Snow v. Directv, Inc.

Holding that the plaintiff's "vague and conclusory allegations" presented in his complaint were insufficient to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction over a defendant

Griggs-Ryan v. Smith

Holding that "implied consent" is inferred from circumstances indicating that party knowingly agreed to surveillance

U.S. v. Warshak

Holding that 18 U.S.C. § 982 forfeiture provision reached "proceeds obtained" from money generated through "legitimate" sales because they "resulted ‘directly or indirectly’ " from the criminal offense

United States v. Graham

Holding that no warrant was required to obtain historical cell site location information

Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

Holding that Congress added protection of "electronic communications" to the Wiretap Act in order "to afford [them] privacy protection"

Sams v. Yahoo! Inc.

Holding that, when considering a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b), courts "are permitted to consider documents that were not physically attached to the complaint where the documents' authenticity is not contested, and the plaintiff's complaint necessarily relies on them"

Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc.

Holding that Facebook posts are stored "for purposes of backup protection" under SCA by analogizing to electronic bulletin boards specifically discussed in SCA's legislative history

Section 2511 - Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited

Imposing a penalty on persons who “intentionally intercept ... any wire, oral, or electronic communication”

Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"

Section 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records

Recognizing that these providers "shall disclose" such information "when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute"

Section 2707 - Civil action

Granting relief to those "aggrieved by any violation of this chapter in which the conduct constituting the violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind"

Section 2702 - Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records

Restricting use of Internet subscriber information without consent

Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice