§Why CasetextPricing

McMILLIN ALBANY v. S.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief of California Infill Federation, California Building Industry Association, and Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation

15 Cited authorities

  1. AAS v. SUPERIOR COURT

    24 Cal.4th 627 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 277 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Finding diminished value of residences containing hazardous defects not compensable

  2. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court

    19 Cal.4th 1036 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 255 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding no constitutional impediment in permitting non-Californians a right of action under a domestic statute because California had a "clear and substantial interest in preventing fraudulent practices in this state," or in "extending state-created remedies to out-of-state parties harmed by wrongful conduct occurring in California."

  3. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.

    133 Cal.App.4th 26 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 202 times
    Denying request for judicial notice for failure to show the "Fact Sheet" was communicated to the Legislature as a whole

  4. Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.

    26 Cal.4th 995 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting suggestion to import rules of criminal law into workers' compensation law without legislative mandate

  5. Hunt v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

    21 Cal.4th 984 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 193 times
    Indicating that judgments do not become final for separation of powers purposes until both the trial and appellate process is complete, and the case is no longer pending in the courts

  6. Save Tara v. City of West Hollywood

    45 Cal.4th 116 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 101 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the "two considerations of legislative policy important to the timing of mandated EIR preparation: that CEQA not be interpreted to require an EIR before the project is well enough defined to allow for meaningful environmental evaluation; and that CEQA not be interpreted as allowing an EIR to be delayed beyond the time when it can, as a practical matter, serve its intended function of informing and guiding decision makers."

  7. Burch v. Superior Court

    223 Cal.App.4th 1411 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 20 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Permitting homebuyer to sue general contractor for property damage caused by a construction defect

  8. KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. Superior Court

    223 Cal.App.4th 1471 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Interpreting statute to require notice to a builder before repairs are made, noting "sequential procedure" set forth in statute

  9. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Brookfield Crystal Cove LLC

    219 Cal.App.4th 98 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 12 times   20 Legal Analyses
    In Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Brookfield Crystal Cove LLC (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 98 (Liberty Mutual), Hart purchased a new home built by Brookfield.

  10. Mount Sutro Defense Comm. v. Regents of University

    77 Cal.App.3d 20 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 20 times
    In Mount Sutro Defense Committee v. Regents of Universityof California (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 20, 40 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 365], the Court of Appeal remarked that "the determination of the earliest feasible time [for environmental review] is to be made initially by the agency itself, which decision must be respected in the absence of manifest abuse."

  11. Section 896 - Liability and claims limited to listed standards; applicability of title; inapplicability to condominium conversions

    Cal. Civ. Code § 896   Cited 66 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Listing construction defects for which the developer is liable

  12. Section 910 - Prelitigation procedures

    Cal. Civ. Code § 910   Cited 49 times
    Requiring exhaustion of prelitigation procedures in all cases where "a violation of the standards set forth in Chapter 2" is alleged

  13. Section 897 - Function or component not addressed by standards

    Cal. Civ. Code § 897   Cited 25 times
    Building standards for housing construction

  14. Section 988 - Ownership of physical work of art

    Cal. Civ. Code § 988   Cited 2 times

    (a) For the purpose of this section: (1) The term "artist" means the creator of a work of art. (2) The term "work of art" means any work of visual or graphic art of any media including, but not limited to, a painting, print, drawing, sculpture, craft, photograph, or film. (b) Whenever an exclusive or nonexclusive conveyance of any right to reproduce, prepare derivative works based on, distribute copies of, publicly perform, or publicly display a work of art is made by or on behalf of the artist who

  15. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or