§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. S.C. (MORALES)

Real Party in Interest, Johnny Morales, Request for Judicial Notice

7 Cited authorities

  1. P1eople. v. Hill

    17 Cal.4th 800 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 3,797 times
    Holding the prosecutor committed misconduct insofar as her statement that '"[t]here has to be some evidence on which to base a doubt'" "could reasonably be interpreted as suggesting to the jury she did not have the burden of proving every element of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt"

  2. People v. Picklesimer

    48 Cal.4th 330 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 265 times
    Holding that claims under Hofsheier by defendants no longer in custody must be brought by a petition for writ of mandate

  3. People v. Woodell

    17 Cal.4th 448 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 376 times
    Holding that the record of conviction includes not only the trial court record but also an appellate opinion, at least for nonhearsay purposes

  4. Cal. Correc. Peace Officers v. State Personnel Bd.

    10 Cal.4th 1133 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 225 times
    Holding time limits of Government Code section 18671.1 are directory, and noting "[t]hey may be enforced by petition for writ of mandate to compel the Board" to act

  5. 300 DeHaro Street Investors v. Department of Housing & Community Development

    161 Cal.App.4th 1240 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 33 times
    Reviewing court may disregard argument not set forth under separate heading

  6. Perrin v. Honeycutt

    144 Cal. 87 (Cal. 1904)   Cited 12 times

    Sac. No. 1241. July 8, 1904. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. W.M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. W.H. Larew, for Appellant. R.R. Fowler, for Respondent. COOPER, C. Defendant's demurrer to the plaintiff's verified petition for a writ of mandate was sustained, and judgment entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. It appears, from the petition, that the defendant is and was at all times named therein the county auditor of

  7. Rule 8.1115 - Citation of opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1115   Cited 73,834 times

    (a) Unpublished opinion Except as provided in (b), an opinion of a California Court of Appeal or superior court appellate division that is not certified for publication or ordered published must not be cited or relied on by a court or a party in any other action. (b)Exceptions An unpublished opinion may be cited or relied on: (1) When the opinion is relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel; or (2) When the opinion is relevant to a criminal or disciplinary