19 Cited authorities

People v. Rivera
233 Cal.App.4th 1085 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015) Cited 1,043 times
Noting Proposition 47 became effective in November 2014
People v. Park
56 Cal.4th 782 (Cal. 2013) Cited 452 times
Finding that a felony wobbler reduced to a misdemeanor would count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667(d), but would not count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667
Robert L. v. Superior Court of Orange County
30 Cal.4th 894 (Cal. 2003) Cited 442 times
Rejecting an argument the electorate intended for an existing statute to limit the scope of a statute enacted by initiative when the statute enacted by initiative did not refer to the existing statute or mirror the existing statute's language
People v. Floyd
31 Cal.4th 179 (Cal. 2003) Cited 365 times
Finding no equal protection violation in the expressly prospective application of Proposition 36 providing for mandatory probation for some convicted of nonviolent drug possession offenses
People v. Rubalcava
23 Cal.4th 322 (Cal. 2000) Cited 257 times
Holding that the intent to use a dagger as a stabbing weapon is not an express element of California Penal Code § 12020
People v. Woodhead
43 Cal.3d 1002 (Cal. 1987) Cited 359 times
Noting the term "convicted" "may have different meanings in different contexts, or even different meanings within a single statute"
People v. Nuckles
56 Cal.4th 601 (Cal. 2013) Cited 134 times
In Nuckles, we said that "[t]he gist of the [ section 32 ] offense is that the accused ‘ "harbors, conceals or aids" the principal with the requisite knowledge and intent.
People v. Garcia
185 Cal.App.4th 1203 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) Cited 143 times
Billing summary of therapy costs amount to substantial evidence
People v. Superior Court (Alfredo Cervantes)
225 Cal.App.4th 1007 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 96 times
Holding inmate may be barred from resentencing even if he or she was not carrying a firearm on his or her person
People v. Espinoza
226 Cal.App.4th 635 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 60 times
In Espinoza, supra, 226 Cal.App.4th 635, a Proposition 36 resentencing case, the Court of Appeal held that excess custody credits do not reduce the PRCS supervision period.
Section 21
Cal. Const. art. VI § 21 Cited 2,918 times
Providing in part: "On stipulation of the parties litigant the court may order a cause to be tried by a temporary judge"

PEOPLE v. MORALES

19 Cited authorities

Noting Proposition 47 became effective in November 2014

Finding that a felony wobbler reduced to a misdemeanor would count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667(d), but would not count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667

Rejecting an argument the electorate intended for an existing statute to limit the scope of a statute enacted by initiative when the statute enacted by initiative did not refer to the existing statute or mirror the existing statute's language

Finding no equal protection violation in the expressly prospective application of Proposition 36 providing for mandatory probation for some convicted of nonviolent drug possession offenses

Holding that the intent to use a dagger as a stabbing weapon is not an express element of California Penal Code § 12020

Noting the term "convicted" "may have different meanings in different contexts, or even different meanings within a single statute"

In Nuckles, we said that "[t]he gist of the [ section 32 ] offense is that the accused ‘ "harbors, conceals or aids" the principal with the requisite knowledge and intent.

Billing summary of therapy costs amount to substantial evidence

Holding inmate may be barred from resentencing even if he or she was not carrying a firearm on his or her person

In Espinoza, supra, 226 Cal.App.4th 635, a Proposition 36 resentencing case, the Court of Appeal held that excess custody credits do not reduce the PRCS supervision period.

Providing in part: "On stipulation of the parties litigant the court may order a cause to be tried by a temporary judge"