24 Cited authorities

In re Harris
5 Cal.4th 813 (Cal. 1993) Cited 900 times
Holding habeas corpus is available in cases where the court has acted in excess of its jurisdiction
Martinez v. Combs
49 Cal.4th 35 (Cal. 2010) Cited 478 times 45 Legal Analyses
Holding that California's wage and hour laws do not impose liability on "individual corporate agents acting within the scope of their agency"
Garcia v. McCutchen
16 Cal.4th 469 (Cal. 1997) Cited 349 times
Holding that implied repeal will be found only when there is no rational basis for harmonizing two potentially conflicting statutes
S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dep't of Indus. Relations
48 Cal.3d 341 (Cal. 1989) Cited 444 times 127 Legal Analyses
Holding that temporary “sharefarmers” were employees entitled to workers' compensation coverage
Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.
10 Cal.3d 222 (Cal. 1973) Cited 534 times
Finding statutes should be construed in light of the statutory framework as a whole
People v. Overstreet
42 Cal.3d 891 (Cal. 1986) Cited 284 times
Reasoning that a statute should be construed "as favorably to the defendant as its language and the circumstance of its application reasonably permit"
Adkins v. Children's Hospital
261 U.S. 525 (1923) Cited 347 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding a minimum-wage law "so clearly the product of a naked, arbitrary exercise of power that it cannot be allowed to stand under the Constitution of the United States"
Gabin v. Skyline Cabana Club
54 N.J. 550 (N.J. 1969) Cited 92 times
Explaining that title of statute may indicate a legislative intent to apply narrowly the broad language of the enactment
Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. Clark
22 Cal.2d 287 (Cal. 1943) Cited 141 times
Noting that the same rules of construction and interpretation apply to regulations of administrative agencies
American Tobacco Co. v. Superior Court
208 Cal.App.3d 480 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989) Cited 27 times
Construing a statute similar to Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.75

DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST v. S.C.

24 Cited authorities

Holding habeas corpus is available in cases where the court has acted in excess of its jurisdiction

Holding that California's wage and hour laws do not impose liability on "individual corporate agents acting within the scope of their agency"

Holding that implied repeal will be found only when there is no rational basis for harmonizing two potentially conflicting statutes

Holding that temporary “sharefarmers” were employees entitled to workers' compensation coverage

Finding statutes should be construed in light of the statutory framework as a whole

Reasoning that a statute should be construed "as favorably to the defendant as its language and the circumstance of its application reasonably permit"

Holding a minimum-wage law "so clearly the product of a naked, arbitrary exercise of power that it cannot be allowed to stand under the Constitution of the United States"

Explaining that title of statute may indicate a legislative intent to apply narrowly the broad language of the enactment

Noting that the same rules of construction and interpretation apply to regulations of administrative agencies

Construing a statute similar to Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.75