12 Cited authorities

  1. Martinez v. Combs

    49 Cal.4th 35 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 347 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California's wage and hour laws do not impose liability on "individual corporate agents acting within the scope of their agency"
  2. Morillion v. Royal Packing Company

    22 Cal.4th 575 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 257 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compulsory travel time on bus from departure point to work site is compensable
  3. S.G. Borello Sons v. Department of Industrial Relations

    48 Cal.3d 341 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 320 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Holding that temporary “sharefarmers” were employees entitled to workers' compensation coverage
  4. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw

    14 Cal.4th 557 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 236 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that interpretive policies contained in 1989 DLSE Manual were void regulations because they were not promulgated in accordance with Administrative Procedures Act; and that insofar as void regulations reflected the DLSE's statutory interpretations, those interpretations were entitled to no deference
  5. Reynolds v. Bement

    36 Cal.4th 1075 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 180 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statutes are construed in light of the common law unless the Legislature clearly and unequivocally indicates otherwise
  6. Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.

    59 Cal.4th 522 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 116 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding trial court's finding that "substantial variations in control exist" is "sufficient to justify denying class certification and thus obviate any need for further inquiry [into secondary factors]"
  7. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior Court

    220 Cal.App.3d 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 119 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding a driver to be an employee where the company “determined what would be delivered, when and to whom and what price would be charged”
  8. Augustus v. ABM Sec. Servs., Inc.

    2 Cal.5th 257 (Cal. 2016)   Cited 52 times   18 Legal Analyses
    In Augustus, the employees were required to carry a device so that the employer could reach the employee during the break if services were needed. Augustus, 211 Cal.Rptr.3d 634, 385 P.3d at 832.
  9. Yellow Cab Cooperative v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

    226 Cal.App.3d 1288 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 26 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that cab drivers provided service to cab company because “the enterprise could no more survive without [drivers] than it could without working cabs”
  10. Fillmore v. Irvine

    146 Cal.App.3d 649 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 15 times
    In Fillmore, the plaintiff was a drywall finisher who acted as an unlicensed independent contractor and hired other drywall workers.
  11. Section 3353

    Cal. Lab. Code § 3353   Cited 51 times

    "Independent contractor" means any person who renders service for a specified recompense for a specified result, under the control of his principal as to the result of his work only and not as to the means by which such result is accomplished. Ca. Lab. Code § 3353

  12. Section 11090 - Order Regulating Wages, Hours, and Working Conditions in the Transportation Industry

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8 § 11090   Cited 146 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing employee "shall not be employed more than eight hours in any workday or more than 40 hours in any workweek unless" employee is paid overtime