43 Cited authorities

  1. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh

    543 U.S. 50 (2004)   Cited 239 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the recovery cap of $2000 in 1640 also applies to cases governed by 1640
  2. Badie v. Bank of America

    67 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 814 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a "bill stuffer" where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution
  3. Comm. on Children's Television v. General Foods Corp.

    35 Cal.3d 197 (Cal. 1983)   Cited 599 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs need not recall specific advertisements, but should show a representative sample
  4. In re Estate of Young

    160 Cal.App.4th 62 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 251 times
    Stating that "the required elements for claims for fraud [are]: misrepresentation (false representation, concealment, or nondisclosure); (b) knowledge of falsity (or scienter); (c) intent to defraud, i.e., to induce reliance; (d) justifiable reliance; and (e) resulting damage"
  5. Sonic Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. v. AAE Systems, Inc.

    196 Cal.App.4th 456 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 194 times
    Applying substantial evidence test to record containing conflicting evidence
  6. Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.

    139 Cal.App.4th 659 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 213 times
    Concluding the plaintiff "abandoned any challenge" to an order striking his claims for abuse of process and for intentional interference "because of his failure to address the matter in his opening brief"
  7. City of Santa Maria v. Adam

    211 Cal.App.4th 266 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 162 times
    Explaining that, "[b]ecause river water is surface water, the [BOR] had to obtain a license from the State Water Resources Control Board ... to appropriate the seasonal flows of the Cuyama River"; adding that the Water District "was formed and given the perpetual right to use the water the project made available"
  8. Cuiellette v. City of Los Angeles

    194 Cal.App.4th 757 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 103 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Noting similar elements under FEHA
  9. Bragg v. Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc.

    374 F.3d 1060 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Determining that consumer was contractually obligated under TILA after signing agreement even if creditor had not signed
  10. Jenkins v. County of Riverside

    138 Cal.App.4th 593 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 67 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. E037030. March 23, 2006. Appeal from the Superior Court of Riverside County, No. RIC360561, Stephen D. Cunnison, Judge. Roth Roth and Diane Catran Roth for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard Smith, Gail F. Montgomery; Arias Aaen and Christopher D. Lockwood for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION KING, J. Plaintiff and appellant Evelyn Jenkins was employed as a temporary employee by defendant and respondent County of Riverside (County). She alleged that after becoming disabled she

  11. Section 1601 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1601   Cited 7,287 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that TILA's disclosure requirements exist “so that the consumer will be able to compare more readily the various credit terms available to him and avoid the uninformed use of credit”
  12. Section 1640 - Civil liability

    15 U.S.C. § 1640   Cited 4,575 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding "any creditor who fails to comply" liable, with creditors defined within § 1602(g) as persons
  13. Section 1638 - Transactions other than under an open end credit plan

    15 U.S.C. § 1638   Cited 1,030 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Describing TILA’s disclosure requirements for consumer credit transactions
  14. § 226.2 Definitions and rules of construction

    12 C.F.R. § 226.2   Cited 841 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining "consumer credit"
  15. § 226.1 Authority, purpose, coverage, organization, enforcement, and liability

    12 C.F.R. § 226.1   Cited 799 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that Regulation Z was issued by the Board of Governors to implement the TILA
  16. § 226.18 Content of disclosures

    12 C.F.R. § 226.18   Cited 509 times
    Requiring disclosure and itemization of, inter alia, the finance charge and the amount financed
  17. § 226.20 Subsequent disclosure requirements

    12 C.F.R. § 226.20   Cited 112 times
    Requiring disclosures for the consumer upon a refinancing
  18. § 226.22 Determination of annual percentage rate

    12 C.F.R. § 226.22   Cited 50 times
    Stating that the annual percentage rate "is a measure of the cost of credit . . . that relates the amount and timing of value received by the consumer to the amount and timing of payments made"
  19. §§ 226.40-226.41 [Reserved]

    12 C.F.R. §§ 226.40-226.41   Cited 4 times

  20. Rule 3.1590 - Announcement of tentative decision, statement of decision, and judgment

    Cal. R. 3.1590   Cited 234 times

    (a) Announcement and service of tentative decision On the trial of a question of fact by the court, the court must announce its tentative decision by an oral statement, entered in the minutes, or by a written statement filed with the clerk. Unless the announcement is made in open court in the presence of all parties that appeared at the trial, the clerk must immediately serve on all parties that appeared at the trial a copy of the minute entry or written tentative decision. (Subd (a) amended effective

  21. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 15 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)