§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

Respondent’s Petition for Review

15 Cited authorities

  1. Day v. City of Fontana

    25 Cal.4th 268 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 292 times
    Adopting construction of statute that “promotes, rather than defeats, its general purpose”

  2. In re Marriage of Harris

    34 Cal.4th 210 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 72 times
    Referring to "special weight" concept from Troxel case

  3. County of Orange v. Lexington Nat. Ins. Corp.

    140 Cal.App.4th 1488 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 39 times
    In County of Orange v. Lexington Nat. Ins. Corp. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1488, 45 Cal.Rptr.3d 543 (Lexington), the criminal defendant failed to appear on March 25, 2003, and the court declared a forfeiture in open court.

  4. People. v. Bankers Ins. Co.

    182 Cal.App.4th 582 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 20 times
    In Bankers, after defendant failed to appear and his lawyer told the court he had had no contact with defendant since his last court appearance, “the court found ‘a willful failure to appear in both the felony and trailing misdemeanor case and issue[d] warrants for [the defendant’s] arrest with no bail....’” (Id. at p. 584.)

  5. People v. National Automobile and Casualty Ins. Co.

    121 Cal.App.4th 1441 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 23 times
    In People v. National Automobile & Casualty Ins. Co. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1441, Division Three of this court rejected an argument very similar to that raised by Accredited.

  6. People v. Ranger Ins., Co.

    135 Cal.App.4th 820 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 19 times

    No. G035212. December 13, 2005. Appeal from the Superior Court of Orange County, No. 04HF0119, James S. Odriozola, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to California Constitution, article VI, section 21. Nunez Bernstein and E. Alan Nunez for Defendant and Appellant. Benjamin P. de Mayo, County Counsel, and Leon J. Page, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION MOORE, J. Ranger Insurance Company (appellant), the surety on a bail bond, appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion

  7. People v. Classified Ins. Corp.

    164 Cal.App.3d 341 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that trial court erred in forfeiting bail for nonappearance at hearing where defendant's presence was not legally required

  8. People v. Sacramento Bail Bonds

    210 Cal.App.3d 118 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 28 times
    Holding no formal court order needed to have been given defendant to require his presence at a trial status conference since it was required under section 977

  9. People v. North Beach Bonding Co.

    36 Cal.App.3d 663 (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)   Cited 50 times
    Reversing forfeiture order and stating "Where there is a breach of the [surety's] obligation, the bail should be enforced. When the nonappearance is not one which the bail was required to and did cover, it would penalize the surety unwarrantably to permit recovery on the undertaking. Forfeitures are disfavored and statutes imposing them are to be strictly construed."

  10. People v. National Automobile and Casualty Ins. Co.

    75 Cal.App.3d 302 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977)   Cited 41 times
    In National Automobile, when the defendant failed to appear, his attorney stated the defendant's mother had called the court to inform it the defendant had been in a car accident.

  11. Rule 8.155 - Augmenting and correcting the record

    Cal. R. 8.155   Cited 859 times

    (a) Augmentation (1) At any time, on motion of a party or its own motion, the reviewing court may order the record augmented to include: (A) Any document filed or lodged in the case in superior court; or (B) A certified transcript-or agreed or settled statement-of oral proceedings not designated under rule 8.130. Unless the court orders otherwise, the appellant is responsible for the cost of any additional transcript the court may order under this subdivision. (2) A party must attach to its motion

  12. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

  13. Rule 4.112 - Readiness conference

    Cal. R. 4.112   Cited 15 times

    (a) Date and appearances The court may hold a readiness conference in felony cases within 1 to 14 days before the date set for trial. At the readiness conference: (1) All trial counsel must appear and be prepared to discuss the case and determine whether the case can be disposed of without trial; (2) The prosecuting attorney must have authority to dispose of the case; and (3) The defendant must be present in court. (b) Motions Except for good cause, the court should hear and decide any pretrial motion