4 Cited authorities

  1. Murgia v. Municipal Court

    15 Cal.3d 286 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 171 times
    Recognizing a defendant's right to bring a pretrial motion to dismiss on the grounds of "`intentional and purposeful' invidious discrimination"
  2. People v. Toomey

    157 Cal.App.3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 122 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a showing of threatened future harm or continuing violation is required" before a court can impose an injunction under California's Business and Professions Code
  3. People v. Shira

    62 Cal.App.3d 442 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 12 times
    In People v. Shira, supra, 62 Cal.App.3d at pages 446-448, the court apparently did not find the set location of the game among active participants or the physical presence of the lottery winner to be an impediment to finding Ringo, a game similar to bingo, to be a lottery.
  4. Lewis v. Harp

    286 P.2d 627 (Colo. 1955)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17,485. Decided August 15, 1955. Rehearing denied August 29, 1955. Action for damages for wrongful death resulting from automobile accident. Judgment for plaintiff. Affirmed. 1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Instructions — Companion Case. That the giving of an instruction on the subject of negligence in a companion case was held to be error, will not be held error in the instant case where counsel for defendant consented to the giving of such instruction. 2. Instructions — Objection. To justify a reversal