§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. TRUJILLO

Respondent’s Petition for Review

20 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Scott

    9 Cal.4th 331 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 3,895 times
    Holding that "complaints about the manner in which the trial court exercises its sentencing discretion and articulates its supporting reasons cannot be raised for the first time on appeal"

  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court

    57 Cal.2d 450 (Cal. 1962)   Cited 5,905 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the "rule requiring a court exercising inferior jurisdiction to follow the decisions of a court exercising a higher jurisdiction"

  3. People v. Alexander

    49 Cal.4th 846 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 751 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a witness's prior statements are admissible under the prior inconsistent statements if the court finds that the lack of memory is due to an unwillingness to cooperate

  4. People v. Welch

    5 Cal.4th 228 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 1,380 times
    Upholding curfew condition between “ ‘dark’ ” and 6:00 a.m.

  5. People v. McCullough

    56 Cal.4th 589 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 632 times
    Holding that a defendant forfeits an appellate challenge to the sufficiency of evidence supporting a jail booking fee if the fee is not first challenged in the trial court

  6. People v. Souza

    54 Cal.4th 90 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 525 times
    Modifying victim/witness restitution amounts to correct ex post facto and other errors

  7. People v. Pacheco

    187 Cal.App.4th 1392 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 382 times
    Holding a defendant's failure to object to imposition of a booking fee does not forfeit an appellate challenge based on insufficiency of the evidence

  8. People v. Flores

    30 Cal.4th 1059 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming remand order by Court of Appeal to allow hearing on defendant's ability to pay

  9. People v. Martinez

    65 Cal.App.4th 1511 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 295 times
    Holding that "the criminal laboratory analysis fee [is] an increase to the total fine and therefore is subject to penalty assessments under [Penal Code] section 1464 and Government Code section 76000"

  10. People v. Valtakis

    105 Cal.App.4th 1066 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 242 times
    Holding that a challenge to the imposition of probation costs was forfeited when defendant failed to object to the fees at sentencing and had initialed a provision on a plea entry form acknowledging he would be subjected to fines and other penalties.

  11. Section 1203.1b - [Repealed]

    Cal. Pen. Code § 1203.1b   Cited 791 times
    Permitting a court to order a defendant placed on probation to bear all or a portion of the reasonable cost of probation supervision, subject to a determination of the defendant's ability to pay such costs

  12. Rule 8.1115 - Citation of opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1115   Cited 73,834 times

    (a) Unpublished opinion Except as provided in (b), an opinion of a California Court of Appeal or superior court appellate division that is not certified for publication or ordered published must not be cited or relied on by a court or a party in any other action. (b)Exceptions An unpublished opinion may be cited or relied on: (1) When the opinion is relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel; or (2) When the opinion is relevant to a criminal or disciplinary

  13. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer