§Why CasetextPricing

CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION v. BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

Appellant’s Request for Judicial Notice

17 Cited authorities

  1. Evans v. City of Berkeley

    38 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 538 times
    Rejecting allegation contradicted by judicially noticed facts

  2. Shapiro v. San Diego City Council

    96 Cal.App.4th 904 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 157 times
    In Shapiro, the court affirmed a judgment enjoining a city to comply with the Brown Act in future real property negotiator closed session meetings regarding acquisition of land for a ballpark, based on the city’s past violations of the Brown Act.

  3. Ampex Corp. v. Cargle

    128 Cal.App.4th 1569 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 99 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that Yahoo!'s message board for Ampex is a public forum for purposes of section 425.16

  4. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.

    11 Cal.4th 1049 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 124 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that under Macri, § 11580.2(p) establishes a precondition to the accrual of the insured's right to coverage

  5. Trinity Park, L.P. v. City of Sunnyvale

    193 Cal.App.4th 1014 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 33 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Approving judicial notice of official acts taken by a city

  6. Sterling Park, L.P. v. City of Palo Alto

    57 Cal.4th 1193 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sterling Park

  7. Love v. Superior Court

    226 Cal.App.3d 736 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    Finding that the legislature "identified sexual contact as a primary means of transmitting the AIDS virus and 'prostitutes who pass on the infection to their clients' as a specific group of concern"

  8. Watson v. Los Altos School Dist

    149 Cal.App.2d 768 (Cal. Ct. App. 1957)   Cited 45 times
    Ignoring contents of exhibits from prior case would be "travesty on justice"

  9. Edna Valley Assn. v. San Luis Obispo County etc. Coordinating Council

    67 Cal.App.3d 444 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977)   Cited 14 times

    Docket No. 48465. February 24, 1977. Appeal from Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, No. 45597, Richard C. Kirkpatrick, Judge. COUNSEL Crossman, Weaver Geihs and Paul A. Geihs for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Robert N. Tait, District Attorney, James B. Lindholm, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, and Joanne Fenton, Deputy District Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION COBEY, Acting P.J. Plaintiffs, Edna Valley Association and Albert C. LoMele, appeal from a judgment of dismissal of

  10. Section 452 - Matters permitting judicial notice

    Cal. Evid. Code § 452   Cited 7,901 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Permitting notice to be taken of the "[o]fficial acts of the . . . judicial departments . . . of any state of the United States"

  11. Section 459 - Duties of reviewing court

    Cal. Evid. Code § 459   Cited 4,178 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing court must notice matter noticed by trial court

  12. Section 4321 - Congressional declaration of purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 4321   Cited 3,494 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Describing the purposes of NEPA as including "encourag[ing] productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment"

  13. Section 21000 - Legislative findings and declaration as to quality of environment

    Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21000   Cited 1,598 times   8 Legal Analyses

    The Legislature finds and declares as follows: (a) The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern. (b) It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to the senses and intellect of man. (c) There is a need to understand the relationship between the maintenance of high-quality ecological systems and the general welfare of the people of the state, including their enjoyment

  14. Section 453 - Notice to adverse parties

    Cal. Evid. Code § 453   Cited 431 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prescribing the conditions under which “[t]he trial court shall take judicial notice of any matter specified in Section 452”

  15. Section 15000 - Authority

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14 § 15000   Cited 557 times   13 Legal Analyses

    The regulations contained in this chapter are prescribed by the Secretary for Resources to be followed by all state and local agencies in California in the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. These Guidelines have been developed by the Office of Planning and Research for adoption by the Secretary for Resources in accordance with Section 2108-3. Additional information may be obtained by writing: SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES ROOM 1311, 1416 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 These

  16. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or

  17. Rule 8.252 - Judicial notice; findings and evidence on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.252   Cited 592 times

    (a)Judicial notice (1) To obtain judicial notice by a reviewing court under Evidence Code section 459, a party must serve and file a separate motion with a proposed order. (2) The motion must state: (A) Why the matter to be noticed is relevant to the appeal; (B) Whether the matter to be noticed was presented to the trial court and, if so, whether judicial notice was taken by that court; (C) If judicial notice of the matter was not taken by the trial court, why the matter is subject to judicial notice