46 Cited authorities

  1. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.

    526 U.S. 687 (1999)   Cited 1,048 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because 42 U.S.C. § 1983 "provides for relief for invasions of rights protected under federal law," claims under that statute "sound in tort"
  2. Dolan v. City of Tigard

    512 U.S. 374 (1994)   Cited 674 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that city could not require development permit applicant to grant a public pathway easement where there was no reasonable relationship between the proposed development and the condition imposed
  3. Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n

    483 U.S. 825 (1987)   Cited 817 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for a development exaction to be constitutional, there must be an "essential nexus" between the valid state interest and the permit condition
  4. Euclid v. Ambler Co.

    272 U.S. 365 (1926)   Cited 2,304 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a zoning ordinance that "greatly ... reduce[d] the value of appellee's lands and destroy[ed] their marketability for industrial, commercial and residential uses" constituted a "present invasion of appellee's property rights"
  5. United States v. Miller

    317 U.S. 369 (1943)   Cited 913 times
    Holding that a federal court does not apply "the law of the State in which the court sits" to "questions of substantive right—such as the measure of compensation"
  6. San Diego Gas Electric Co. v. Superior Court

    13 Cal.4th 893 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 218 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a negligence claim would be barred by Section 1759 because "an award of damages on that theory would plainly undermine the commission's policy by holding the utility liable for not doing what the commission has repeatedly determined that it and all similarly situated utilities were not required to do."
  7. Hensler v. City of Glendale

    8 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 230 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Suggesting that, though the California constitution protects a somewhat broader range of property than the Fifth Amendment, the necessity of obtaining a final decision from the regulatory entity applies with equal force to claims under state law
  8. City of Los Angeles v. Decker

    18 Cal.3d 860 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 171 times
    In City of Los Angeles v. Decker (1977) 18 Cal.3d 860 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 647, 558 P.2d 545], we held applicable to an eminent domain action the requirement that government attorneys be unaffected by personal interests: "Occupying a position analogous to a public prosecutor, [the government attorney] is `possessed... of important governmental powers that are pledged to the accomplishment of one objective only, that of impartial justice.' (Professional Responsibility: Report of theJoint Conference (1958) 44 A.B.A.J. 1159, 1218.)
  9. Ehrlich v. City of Culver City

    911 P.2d 429 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 96 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the requirement to provide art or a cash equivalent is more akin to traditional land use regulations imposing minimal building setbacks, parking and lighting conditions, landscaping requirements, and other design conditions such as color schemes, building materials and architectural amenities. Such . . . conditions have long been held to be valid exercises of the city's traditional police power, and do not amount to a taking merely because they might incidentally . . . impose a cost in connection with the property."
  10. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.

    941 P.2d 809 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 65 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In L.A. County Metro. Transp. Auth. v. Continental Dev. Corp., 16 Cal. 4th 694 (1994) ("MTA"), the California Supreme Court considered Continental's motion for litigation expenses after the jury's award of severance damages substantially exceeded the MTA's final statutory offer.
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 368,359 times   525 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Section 800

    Cal. Evid. Code § 800   Cited 354 times
    Requiring lay opinion testimony be "[h]elpful to a clear understanding of testimony"
  13. Section 4651 - Uniform policy on real property acquisition practices

    42 U.S.C. § 4651   Cited 150 times
    Codifying the scope-of-the-project rule with respect to any "decrease or increase in the fair market value of real property prior to the date of valuation caused by the public improvement for which such property is acquired"