20 Cited authorities

Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (1969) Cited 13,220 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here
Ben v. Ben
40 Cal.4th 529 (Cal. 2007) Cited 680 times
Holding Wende review unnecessary in appeal from conservatorship order
In re Tahl
1 Cal.3d 122 (Cal. 1969) Cited 1,573 times
In People v. Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122 (Tahl), the California Supreme Court interpreted Boykin v. Alabama as requiring that "each of the three rights mentioned-self-incrimination, confrontation, and jury trial-must be specifically and expressly enumerated for the benefit of and waived by the accused prior to acceptance of his guilty plea."
Robert L. v. Superior Court of Orange County
30 Cal.4th 894 (Cal. 2003) Cited 442 times
Rejecting an argument the electorate intended for an existing statute to limit the scope of a statute enacted by initiative when the statute enacted by initiative did not refer to the existing statute or mirror the existing statute's language
People v. Murphy
25 Cal.4th 136 (Cal. 2001) Cited 337 times
Holding that the Three Strikes sentencing scheme applied in addition to other sentencing enhancements because the phrase "notwithstanding any other law" was unambiguous
People v. Price
120 Cal.App.4th 224 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) Cited 230 times
Finding victim's hearsay statements offered to prove defendant's prior acts of domestic violence were admissible
In re Yurko
10 Cal.3d 857 (Cal. 1974) Cited 490 times
Noting an offender must be informed "of the precise increase in the term or terms which might be imposed"
People v. Little
115 Cal.App.4th 766 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) Cited 113 times
Holding that such a situation, in addition to evidence of unsanitary household conditions, supported a conviction under section 273a(b)
People v. Cooksey
95 Cal.App.4th 1407 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 81 times
In Cooksey, the defendant pleaded guilty to discharging a firearm into a residence, and the trial court granted probation with a one-year jail term condition.
People v. Newman
21 Cal.4th 413 (Cal. 1999) Cited 77 times
In Newman, supra, 21 Cal.4th 413, the prosecutor charged the defendant with being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021) and alleged six prior felony convictions enhancements.
Rule 8.1110 - Partial publication
Cal. R. 8.1110 Cited 2,325 times
(a)Order for partial publication A majority of the rendering court may certify for publication any part of an opinion meeting a standard for publication under rule 8.1105. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Opinion contents The published part of the opinion must specify the part or parts not certified for publication. All material, factual and legal, including the disposition, that aids in the application or interpretation of the published part must be published. (c) Construction For
Rule 8.1100 - Authority
Cal. R. 8.1100 Cited 417 times
The rules governing the publication of appellate opinions are adopted by the Supreme Court under section 14 of article VI of the California Constitution and published in the California Rules of Court at the direction of the Judicial Council. Cal. R. Ct. 8.1100 Rule 8.1100 adopted effective 1/1/2007.
Rule 8.500 - Petition for review
Cal. R. 8.500 Cited 337 times
(a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

PEOPLE v. CROSS

20 Cited authorities

Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here

Holding Wende review unnecessary in appeal from conservatorship order

Rejecting an argument the electorate intended for an existing statute to limit the scope of a statute enacted by initiative when the statute enacted by initiative did not refer to the existing statute or mirror the existing statute's language

Holding that the Three Strikes sentencing scheme applied in addition to other sentencing enhancements because the phrase "notwithstanding any other law" was unambiguous

Finding victim's hearsay statements offered to prove defendant's prior acts of domestic violence were admissible

Noting an offender must be informed "of the precise increase in the term or terms which might be imposed"

Holding that such a situation, in addition to evidence of unsanitary household conditions, supported a conviction under section 273a(b)

In Cooksey, the defendant pleaded guilty to discharging a firearm into a residence, and the trial court granted probation with a one-year jail term condition.

In Newman, supra, 21 Cal.4th 413, the prosecutor charged the defendant with being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021) and alleged six prior felony convictions enhancements.