60 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 17,386 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"
  2. Melendez–Diaz v. Massachusetts

    557 U.S. 305 (2009)   Cited 3,542 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a certification that material seized by the police included cocaine was testimonial
  3. Smith v. Phillips

    455 U.S. 209 (1982)   Cited 4,848 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a juror's pending job application with the prosecutor's office required a post-trial hearing on juror bias
  4. Griffin v. California

    380 U.S. 609 (1965)   Cited 4,840 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prosecutor may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify
  5. People v. Rodriguez

    20 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 2,265 times
    Concluding appellate court deviated from the "well-established methodology" of substantial evidence review by "rejecting contrary (but, in [the high court's] view, equally logical) inferences the jury might have drawn"
  6. People v. Avila

    38 Cal.4th 491 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 1,573 times
    Holding that the trial court had not abused its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial after a prosecution witness referred to the defendants having recently been in prison, and the trial court admonished the jury as to the limited purpose for which the evidence was admitted
  7. People v. Clark

    52 Cal.4th 856 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 1,274 times
    Holding that because the jury was instructed to ignore the improper question, there was little risk the jury made improper inferences from defendant's silence
  8. People v. Guerra

    37 Cal.4th 1067 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 1,571 times
    Finding that under the state of mind exception, the trial court properly admitted witness's statements that she believed defendant came into her house as she napped and that she was afraid of him because it was probative of her lack of consent to sexual intercourse in the attempted rape
  9. People v. Johnson

    26 Cal.3d 557 (Cal. 1980)   Cited 4,471 times
    Holding that an attorney may not waive a defendant's right to a speedy trial to accommodate the interests of other clients rather than benefit the defendant
  10. People v. Stanley

    10 Cal.4th 764 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 2,193 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding admission of evidence of a car arson as an offense that "involved an implied threat of violence against a person"
  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer