20 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Keichler

    129 Cal.App.4th 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 289 times
    Affirming restitution order for traditional Hmong healing ceremonies and herbal medicines where defendant pleaded no contest to violating civil rights by uttering racial slurs during a fight
  2. In re Johnny M.

    100 Cal.App.4th 1128 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 235 times
    Holding that restitution ordered paid to a school the defendant vandalized for labor costs, including benefits, of salaried employees who repaired the damage was appropriate where the school was deprived of the employees' work product during the time spent effecting repairs
  3. In re K.F.

    173 Cal.App.4th 655 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 115 times
    Holding that the depletion of sick leave rendered it unavailable to cover future illnesses and represented an economic loss to the victim
  4. In re Brittany L.

    99 Cal.App.4th 1381 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 137 times
    Requiring the minor to make complete reparation to the victims is likely to " 'make an impression on the [minor]' " and is consistent with the goals of victim restitution
  5. In re Anthony M.

    156 Cal.App.4th 1010 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 112 times
    In Anthony M. the court ruled that where the medical provider was paid a certain amount by Medi-Cal and was precluded by law from seeking any further payment from the victim, the victim’s economic loss was the amount paid by Medi-Cal to the medical provider on the victim’s behalf because under some circumstances Medi-Cal.
  6. People v. Martinez

    36 Cal.4th 384 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 95 times
    Discussing Pen.Code, § 1202.4
  7. People v. Goulart

    224 Cal.App.3d 71 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 110 times
    In Goulart, the defendant was sentenced to probation subject to his paying restitution, in part, for thefts that occurred prior to the conduct underlying his conviction.
  8. Ricki J. v. Superior Court

    128 Cal.App.4th 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 54 times
    Describing confession to concealing lingerie under one's clothing and leaving without paying for the items as an admission to the allegation of shoplifting
  9. In re Tommy A.

    131 Cal.App.4th 1580 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 53 times
    Finding no restitution offset even though the victim signed an agreement expressly releasing the minor
  10. Runyon v. Board of Trustees of California State University

    48 Cal.4th 760 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that section 8547.10 did not include provision for parallel damages action as provided for California State University ("CSU") employees by section 8547.12(c) or for other non-University state agency employees by section 8547.8(c)
  11. Section 28

    Cal. Const. art. I § 28   Cited 2,118 times
    Granting crime victims the right "[t]o reasonable notice of all public proceedings, including delinquency proceedings, upon request, at which the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to be present"
  12. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

  13. Rule 8.1125 - Requesting depublication of published opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1125   Cited 204 times

    (a) Request (1) Any person may request the Supreme Court to order that an opinion certified for publication not be published. (2) The request must not be made as part of a petition for review, but by a separate letter to the Supreme Court not exceeding 10 pages. (3) The request must concisely state the person's interest and the reason why the opinion should not be published. (4) The request must be delivered to the Supreme Court within 30 days after the decision is final in the Court of Appeal. (5)