18 Cited authorities

  1. Ballard v. Uribe

    41 Cal.3d 564 (Cal. 1986)   Cited 734 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting appeal based upon inadequate record
  2. Rowland v. Christian

    69 Cal.2d 108 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 1,015 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 1714 superceded prior common-law negligence rules
  3. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center

    6 Cal.4th 666 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 398 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to impose duty without requisite degree of foreseeability would force landlords to become insurers of public safety
  4. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club

    571 Pa. 580 (Pa. 2002)   Cited 159 times
    Holding that tennis club owed no duty to tennis club member who suffered heart attack while playing tennis to acquire and maintain a defibrillator on its premises for emergency use
  5. Delgado v. Trax Bar & Grill

    36 Cal.4th 224 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 137 times
    Finding that the duty of care regarding premises liability for a business proprietor extends only to foreseeable criminal acts that are likely to occur
  6. Sharon P. v. Arman Ltd.

    21 Cal.4th 1181 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 115 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Sharon P., the plaintiff sued the owner of the parking garage of her work building after she was attacked and sexually assaulted there.
  7. Rotolo v. San Jose Sports

    151 Cal.App.4th 307 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that special relationship between operators of sports facility and hockey players did not create a duty to notify users of the facility of the existence and location of AEDs at the facility
  8. Fitness v. Mayer

    980 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that duty is a "question of law to be determined solely by the court."
  9. Klein v. U.S.

    537 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that "the Ninth Circuit is bound by the California Supreme Court's interpretation of California law" with respect to a certified question
  10. Gomez v. Ticor

    145 Cal.App.3d 622 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 47 times
    Stating that "the deserted . . . nature of these structures, especially at night, makes them likely places for robbers and rapists to lie in wait"
  11. Section 1797.196

    Cal. Health and Saf. Code § 1797.196   Cited 6 times

    (a) For purposes of this section, "AED" or "defibrillator" means an automated external defibrillator. (b) (1) In order to ensure public safety, a person or entity that acquires an AED shall do all of the following: (A) Comply with all regulations governing the placement of an AED. (B)Notify an agent of the local EMS agency of the existence, location, and type of AED acquired. (C) Ensure that the AED is maintained and tested according to the operation and maintenance guidelines set forth by the manufacturer

  12. Section 1714.21

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1714.21   Cited 4 times

    (a) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "AED" or "defibrillator" means an automated external defibrillator. (2) "CPR" means cardiopulmonary resuscitation. (b) Any person who, in good faith and not for compensation, renders emergency care or treatment by the use of an AED at the scene of an emergency is not liable for any civil damages resulting from any acts or omissions in rendering the emergency care. (c) A person or entity who provides CPR and AED training

  13. Rule 8.548 - Decision on request of a court of another jurisdiction

    Cal. R. 8.548   Cited 130 times

    (a)Request for decision On request of the United States Supreme Court, a United States Court of Appeals, or the court of last resort of any state, territory, or commonwealth, the Supreme Court may decide a question of California law if: (1) The decision could determine the outcome of a matter pending in the requesting court; and (2) There is no controlling precedent. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b)Form and contents of request The request must take the form of an order of the requesting