74 Cited authorities

  1. Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty.

    693 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 6,159 times
    Holding that "claims [that are] voluntarily dismissed" are "waived if not repled" in an amended complaint"
  2. Kolender v. Lawson

    461 U.S. 352 (1983)   Cited 2,880 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding state misdemeanor statute unconstitutionally vague within the meaning of the Due Process Clause
  3. Grayned v. City of Rockford

    408 U.S. 104 (1972)   Cited 4,506 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute's words, even when "marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth, rather than meticulous specificity," are clear based on "what the ordinance as a whole prohibits"
  4. Secretary of State of Md. v. J. H. Munson Co.

    467 U.S. 947 (1984)   Cited 847 times
    Holding that a fundraiser that contracted with charities could assert the charities’ First Amendment rights because it had third-party standing to do so
  5. Stogner v. California

    539 U.S. 607 (2003)   Cited 434 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an ex post facto violation occurs when Congress enacts a new statute of limitations after the expiration of a previously applicable one in order to revive a formerly time-barred prosecution, but that nothing "prevent the State from extending time limits for . . . prosecutions not yet time barred"
  6. Bouie v. City of Columbia

    378 U.S. 347 (1964)   Cited 1,437 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an unforeseeable judicial enlargement of a criminal statute, applied retroactively, operates precisely like an ex post facto law" and is prohibited by the Due Process Clause
  7. Meyer v. Grant

    486 U.S. 414 (1988)   Cited 503 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a Colorado statute that prohibited payment for the circulation of ballot-initiative petitions
  8. Smith v. California

    361 U.S. 147 (1959)   Cited 886 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding statute imposing strict liability for possession of obscene book in bookstore is unconstitutional
  9. Thornhill v. Alabama

    310 U.S. 88 (1940)   Cited 1,664 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights
  10. Robinson Helicopter Co. v. Dana Corp.

    34 Cal.4th 979 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 650 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding the "narrow" exception to the economic loss rule is "limited to a defendant's affirmative misrepresentations on which a plaintiff relies and which expose a plaintiff to liability for personal damages."
  11. Section 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

    18 U.S.C. § 1505   Cited 539 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing criminal punishment for person who corruptly obstructs or endeavors to obstruct "due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States"
  12. Section 1515 - Definitions for certain provisions; general provision

    18 U.S.C. § 1515   Cited 294 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining the term "bodily injury" for the purposes of § 1513 as involving, e.g. , "disfigurement," "physical pain," or "impairment of the function of a bodily member [or] organ."
  13. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 2,600 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or