§Why CasetextPricing

GILLETTE COMPANY v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD

Respondent’s Petition for Review

45 Cited authorities

  1. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.

    513 U.S. 30 (1994)   Cited 714 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Port Authority does not enjoy Eleventh Amendment immunity despite the fact that "[s]tate courts . . . repeatedly have typed the Port Authority an agency of the States rather than a municipal unit or local district"

  2. United States v. Winstar Corp.

    518 U.S. 839 (1996)   Cited 529 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the enactment of FIRREA breached certain government contracts

  3. Bank of the West v. Superior Court

    2 Cal.4th 1254 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,376 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that policy terms must be read in their "ordinary and popular sense"

  4. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota

    358 U.S. 450 (1959)   Cited 414 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that neither the Commerce Clause nor the Due Process Clause of United States Constitution prevent states from taxing net income of an interstate business that is "earned from and fairly apportioned to business activities within the taxing State"

  5. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    472 U.S. 159 (1985)   Cited 135 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal law authorized states to decide whether to allow in-state banks to be purchased by out-of-state holding companies

  6. Melton v. Boustred

    183 Cal.App.4th 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 165 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding property owner could not have reasonably foreseen assaults by third parties attending party owner publicized on internet

  7. U.S. Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Comm'n

    434 U.S. 452 (1978)   Cited 101 times
    Holding that the Multistate Tax Compact did not "enhance state power" with respect to the federal government and therefore did not require congressional consent

  8. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Shewry

    137 Cal.App.4th 964 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 135 times
    Holding that a party's " ‘undisclosed intent or understanding is irrelevant to contract interpretation.’ "

  9. Employers Reinsurance Co. v. Superior Court

    161 Cal.App.4th 906 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 113 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that evidence of performance is relevant to ascertain the meaning of the parties' agreement

  10. Texas v. New Mexico

    462 U.S. 554 (1983)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that, upon approval by Congress, a compact between states becomes federal law that binds the states

  11. Section 2 - Judicial Power and Jurisdiction

    U.S. Const. art. III, § 2   Cited 10,463 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal courts power only to resolve “cases” and “controversies”

  12. Section 10 - Powers Denied to the States

    U.S. Const. art. I, § 10   Cited 4,837 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting specific acts by the States

  13. Section 9

    Cal. Const. art. I § 9   Cited 670 times   2 Legal Analyses

    A bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts may not be passed. Cal. Const. art. I § 9

  14. Section 9

    Cal. Const. art. IV § 9   Cited 107 times   1 Legal Analyses

    A statute shall embrace but one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. If a statute embraces a subject not expressed in its title, only the part not expressed is void. A statute may not be amended by reference to its title. A section of a statute may not be amended unless the section is re-enacted as amended. Cal. Const. art. IV § 9

  15. Section 1251 - Agreement to provide for use of audiovisual curriculum materials

    Cal. Ed. Code § 1251   Cited 3 times

    The county superintendent of schools, with the approval of the county board of education, may enter into an agreement with a nonpublic institution of higher education, the governing board of any nonpublic school, a public agency, or a nonprofit public organization to provide for the use by the institution, agency, organization, or school of audiovisual curriculum materials, including equipment and apparatus, under the control of the county superintendent of schools, in the same manner as public schools

  16. Section 179 - [Operative until 3/1/2028] Ratified and approved

    Cal. Gov. Code § 179   Cited 2 times

    (a) It is the intent of the State of California to continue its long history of sharing emergency response resources with other states during times of disaster. Californian's have benefited from the assistance provided by the firefighters, law enforcement officers, emergency medical personnel and other emergency staff received from other states during our calamitous fires, earthquakes, winter storms, and other disasters. We must now join our sister states in ensuring we are prepared to aid our people

  17. Section 301.5 - Division of board of directors into classes

    Cal. Corp. Code § 301.5   Cited 2 times   4 Legal Analyses

    (a)A listed corporation may, by amendment of its articles or bylaws, adopt provisions to divide the board of directors into two or three classes to serve for terms of two or three years respectively, or to eliminate cumulative voting, or both. After the issuance of shares, a corporation that is not a listed corporation may, by amendment of its articles or bylaws, adopt provisions to be effective when the corporation becomes a listed corporation to divide the board of directors into two or three classes

  18. Section 1101 - Amendment of articles by deleting assessment provision

    Cal. Fin. Code § 1101

    (a) In this section: (1) "Assessment provision" means the provision in the articles of a bank that complies with the requirements of Section 600.2, as in effect immediately before the effective date of this section, or any predecessor statute. (2) "Bank" means any (A) California state bank or (B) corporation organized under the laws of this state for the purpose of transacting business pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 1850) of Chapter 21. (b) On and after the effective date of this

  19. Section 17522.5 - Liquidation of financial asset in commercially reasonable manner

    Cal. Fam. Code § 17522.5

    (a) Notwithstanding Section 8112 of the Commercial Code and Section 700.130 of the Code of Civil Procedure, when a local child support agency pursuant to Section 17522, or the department pursuant to Section 17454 or 17500, issues a levy upon, or requires by notice any employer, person, political officer or entity, or depository institution to withhold the amount of, as applicable, a financial asset for the purpose of collecting a delinquent child support obligation, the person, financial institution

  20. Section 1629 - Annual resolution to identify estimated appropriations limit for county office of education

    Cal. Ed. Code § 1629

    On or before October 15 of each year, the county board of education shall adopt a resolution to identify, pursuant to Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) of Title 1 of the Government Code, the estimated appropriations limit for the county office of education for the current fiscal year and the actual appropriations limit for the county office of education for the preceding fiscal year. That resolution shall be adopted at a regular or special meeting of the board. Notwithstanding Section 7910

  21. Rule 5.134 - Notice of entry of judgment [Repealed]

    Cal. R. 5.134   Cited 1 times

    Cal. R. Ct. 5.134 Rule 5.134 repealed effective 1/1/2013; adopted as rule 1247 effective 1/1/1970; previously amended and renumbered effective 1/1/2003; previously amended effective 1/1/1972,1/1/1982,1/1/1999, and1/1/2007.

  22. Rule 5.110 - Summons; restraining order [Repealed]

    Cal. R. 5.110

    Cal. R. Ct. 5.110 Rule 5.110 repealed effective 1/1/2013; adopted as rule 1216 effective 1/1/1970; previously amended and renumbered effective 1/1/2003; previously amended effective 7/1/1990,1/1/1994,1/1/1999,1/1/2001, and1/1/2007.