No. 93-2120. Submitted August 13, 1993. Decided September 30, 1993. Thomas M. Tuntland, Mandan, ND, argued, for appellant. Gary Annear, Fargo, ND, argued, for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. Before JOHN R. GIBSON, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Guadalupe Mejia, Jr., appeals his conviction for using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). He argues that the evidence
Docket Nos. D003662, D004996. February 20, 1987. Appeal from Superior Court of San Diego County, No. CR 72948, Barbara T. Gamer, Judge. COUNSEL Denise Moreno Ducheny for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner. John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Frederick R. Millar, Jr., Jay M. Bloom, Maxine Cutler and David I. Friedenberg, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION WIENER, J. Joseph S. Brooks appeals from the judgment entered after he entered a negotiated guilty plea to unlawfully
Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 44,056. Decided October 4, 1948. Appeal from Ingham; Hayden (Charles H.), J. Submitted June 15, 1948. (Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 44,056.) Decided October 4, 1948. Bill by Roberts Tobacco Company, a Michigan corporation, against Department of Revenue to restrain furnishing a list of customers of plaintiff to anyone not in employ of defendant. Bill dismissed. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Monaghan, Clark, Crawmer Hart ( L. Edwin Wenger, of counsel), for plaintiff. Eugene
No. 17952. April 30, 1925. Ulic J. Burke and Jules A. Grasser, both of New Orleans, La., for relator. Robert H. Marr, Dist. Atty., of New Orleans, La., for respondent. Habeas Corpus. Petition by the United States, on relation of Hart Austin, alias Frank Smith, against George E. Williams and others, for writ of habeas corpus. Writ discharged. BEATTIE, District Judge. The relator petitioned for and obtained a writ of habeas corpus, alleging, among other things, that he was held and imprisoned by the
16 U.S.C. § 14 Pub. L. 88-578, §2(a), Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 899 Section, acts Mar. 7, 1928, ch. 137, §1, 45 Stat. 238; Mar. 4, 1929, ch. 705, §1, 45 Stat. 1602, prohibited expenditure of appropriations for National Park Service where campground privileges are charged for by the Park Service. STATUTORY NOTES AND RELATED SUBSIDIARIES EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPEALRepeal effective Jan. 1, 1965, see section 1(a) of Pub. L. 88-578 set out in part as an Effective Date of 1964 Amendment note under section 460d
(a) Information The Commission may conduct regular investigations of the markets for goods, articles, services, rights, and interests which are the subject of futures contracts, and furnish reports of the findings of these investigations to the public on a regular basis. These market reports shall, where appropriate, include information on the supply, demand, prices, and other conditions in the United States and other countries with respect to such goods, articles, services, rights, interests, and
(a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or
(a)Judicial notice (1) To obtain judicial notice by a reviewing court under Evidence Code section 459, a party must serve and file a separate motion with a proposed order. (2) The motion must state: (A) Why the matter to be noticed is relevant to the appeal; (B) Whether the matter to be noticed was presented to the trial court and, if so, whether judicial notice was taken by that court; (C) If judicial notice of the matter was not taken by the trial court, why the matter is subject to judicial notice