§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON

Appellant, Corey Ray Johnson, Answer Brief on the Merits

8 Cited authorities

  1. In re Tobacco II Cases

    46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 1,202 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied

  2. People v. Rodriguez

    55 Cal.4th 1125 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 518 times
    Discussing CPC § 186.22

  3. Krulewitch v. United States

    336 U.S. 440 (1949)   Cited 989 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an out-of-court statement of one conspirator may be admitted against his fellow conspirator only if the statements were "made pursuant to and in furtherance of objectives of the conspiracy charged"

  4. People ex rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.

    24 Cal.4th 415 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 563 times

    S082325 Filed November 6, 2000 Appeal from Superior Court, San Diego County, No. 702204, Robert J. O'Neill, Judge, Ct.App. 4/1 D031041, Review Granted, 73 Cal.App.4th 1396. DeCuir Somach, Somach, Simmons Dunn, Michael E. Vergara; Blodgett, Makechnie Vetne, John H. Vetne; Landels Ripley Diamond, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach and Sanford Svetcov for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lungren and Bill Lockyer, Attorneys General, George Williamson, Roderick E. Walston and Richard M. Frank, Chief

  5. People v. Pieters

    52 Cal.3d 894 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 282 times
    Referring to sections 12022.7 and 12022.9 as enhancements for “infliction of great bodily injury”

  6. Williams v. Garcetti

    5 Cal.4th 561 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 200 times
    Rejecting a due process vagueness challenge to Pen. Code, § 272 because Welf. & Inst. Code " 300 provides guidelines sufficiently specific to delineate the circumstances under which a child will qualify for dependent status and thus to define the parental duty of care and protection that would prevent the occurrence of those circumstances"

  7. Babalola v. Superior Court (People)

    192 Cal.App.4th 948 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 52 times
    Requiring notice in advance of hearing for criminal protective order

  8. California Veterinary Medical Assn. v. City of West Hollywood

    152 Cal.App.4th 536 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 41 times
    Upholding city prohibition against routine cat declawing, absent any discernible, contrary state intention