8 Cited authorities

  1. In re Tobacco II Cases

    46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 991 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
  2. People v. Rodriguez

    55 Cal.4th 1125 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 441 times
    Discussing CPC § 186.22
  3. Krulewitch v. United States

    336 U.S. 440 (1949)   Cited 962 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an out-of-court statement of one conspirator may be admitted against his fellow conspirator only if the statements were "made pursuant to and in furtherance of objectives of the conspiracy charged"
  4. People ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Company

    24 Cal.4th 415 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 428 times

    S082325 Filed November 6, 2000 Appeal from Superior Court, San Diego County, No. 702204, Robert J. O'Neill, Judge, Ct.App. 4/1 D031041, Review Granted, 73 Cal.App.4th 1396. DeCuir Somach, Somach, Simmons Dunn, Michael E. Vergara; Blodgett, Makechnie Vetne, John H. Vetne; Landels Ripley Diamond, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach and Sanford Svetcov for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lungren and Bill Lockyer, Attorneys General, George Williamson, Roderick E. Walston and Richard M. Frank, Chief

  5. People v. Pieters

    52 Cal.3d 894 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 254 times
    In Pieters, the court held that "drug quantity" enhancements imposed pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 11370.4 are impliedly excepted from the double-base term limitation of former section 1170.1, subdivision (g).
  6. Williams v. Garcetti

    5 Cal.4th 561 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 159 times
    In Williams v. Garcetti, supra, 5 Cal.4th 561, a case in which a criminal statute that prohibited contributing to the delinquency of a minor was challenged on the ground the statute was unconstitutionally vague, this court stated: "Plaintiffs emphasize the fundamental nature of the rights at stake in matters of child rearing.
  7. Babalola v. Superior Court

    192 Cal.App.4th 948 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 45 times
    In Babalola, we considered a similar question concerning the sufficiency of notice prior to the issuance of a criminal protective order.
  8. Cal. Vet. v. City of West

    152 Cal.App.4th 536 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 32 times

    No. B188723. June 22, 2007. Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. SC084799, James Allen Bascue, Judge. Eisenberg, Raizman, Thurston Wong, Orly Degani; Sedgwick, Detert, Moran Arnold, Orly Degani; and Michael Jenkins, City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant. Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, George A. Nicoud III, Sarah E. Piepmeier, Perlette Michele Jura, Kahn A. Scolnick and Vanessa C. Adriance for Animal Legal Defense Fund, The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights and the Paw