§Why CasetextPricing

GARCIA (SERGIO C.) ON ADMISSION

Amicus Curiae Brief of Sandra L. Brooks, et al.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Plyler v. Doe

    457 U.S. 202 (1982)   Cited 3,007 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that States cannot deny to illegal aliens the free public education they provide to citizens and legally documented aliens

  2. Grutter v. Bollinger

    539 U.S. 306 (2003)   Cited 538 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a race-sensitive admissions program was narrowly tailored because the consideration of race was merely one factor in the decision-making process and individualized consideration was given to each applicant

  3. University of California Regents v. Bakke

    438 U.S. 265 (1978)   Cited 1,173 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff suffered an injury when he could not compete for all places in his entering medical school class

  4. Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper

    470 U.S. 274 (1985)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New Hampshire rule excluding nonresidents from bar violated Clause

  5. Sweatt v. Painter

    339 U.S. 629 (1950)   Cited 180 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the University of Texas Law School's racially discriminatory admittance policy violated the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

  6. Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon Frank v. Superior Ct.

    17 Cal.4th 119 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 115 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a New York law firm with no attorneys licensed to practice law in California engaged in unauthorized practice of law in California, where it performed legal services in California for a California-based client under a fee agreement stipulating that it was governed by California law

  7. Estate of Condon

    65 Cal.App.4th 1138 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Awarding Trynin fees in appeal governed by section 10811

  8. Bradshaw v. United States District Court for Southern District

    742 F.2d 515 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 17 times
    Approving district court's consideration, in deciding not to make a mandatory appointment, of attorneys' assessment that the plaintiff's claims were meritless and that taking the case could subject them to discipline, as well as of the plaintiff's antagonistic behavior toward previous counsel

  9. Crawford v. State Bar

    54 Cal.2d 659 (Cal. 1960)   Cited 30 times
    In Crawford v. State Bar of California, 54 Cal.2d 659, 668, 7 Cal.Rptr. 746, 751, 355 P.2d 490, 495 (1960), the California Supreme Court noted that the work of a law clerk, and by extension the work of a suspended or disbarred attorney acting as a law clerk, "'must be such... as loses its separate identity and becomes merged in the product, of the attorney himself.'"

  10. In re Admission to Practice Law

    1 Cal.2d 61 (Cal. 1934)   Cited 15 times

    Docket No. Misc. 1280. May 28, 1934. PROCEEDING to review the report of the Committee of Bar Examiners on the examination of applicants for admission to practice law. Report affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H.C. Wyckoff, President, The State Bar of California, Alfred L. Bartlett, Chairman, The Committee of Bar Examiners, M.R. Kirkwood, Wm. N. Simmons, Gordon Johnson, Orrin K. McMurray, William G. Hale, Edwin J. Owen, Arthur E. Briggs and Kimball Fletcher, in support of

  11. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,386 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  12. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,067 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

  13. Section 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1324a   Cited 580 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the Attorney General to pursue injunctive relief and criminal sanctions in federal district court

  14. Section 1091 - Student eligibility

    20 U.S.C. § 1091   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining "satisfactory progress"

  15. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or