§Why CasetextPricing

GARCIA (SERGIO C.) ON ADMISSION

Amicus Curiae Brief of California Latino Legislative Caucus

13 Cited authorities

  1. Plyler v. Doe

    457 U.S. 202 (1982)   Cited 3,007 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that States cannot deny to illegal aliens the free public education they provide to citizens and legally documented aliens

  2. Brown v. Board of Education

    347 U.S. 483 (1954)   Cited 2,646 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place"

  3. Serrano v. Priest

    18 Cal.3d 728 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 217 times
    Holding California violated the California Constitution in its manner of financing public schools

  4. Dandamudi v. Tisch

    686 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the H-B1 visa program goes beyond merely allowing a nonimmigrant to enter the United States temporarily because the visa also grants nonimmigrant aliens permission to work in certain occupations

  5. Martinez v. Regents of University of California

    50 Cal.4th 1277 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 32 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "immediate presence" in section 215 had the same meaning as in section 211 and could include a victim being carjacked while baking in the kitchen

  6. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson

    908 F. Supp. 755 (C.D. Cal. 1995)   Cited 35 times
    Finding that a subsection of a state statute is an impermissible regulation of immigration because the state classification "is not in any way tied to federal standards "

  7. Sei Fujii v. State of California

    38 Cal.2d 718 (Cal. 1952)   Cited 74 times
    In Sei Fujii v. State of California, 38 Cal.2d 718, 730-731 [ 242 P.2d 617], the Supreme Court of this state, recognizing that the latest declarations of the United States Supreme Court on the California Alien Land Law were irreconcilable with the approach previously taken in a case which had not been overruled (and in which, unlike the Drueding case, there had been a full-fledged opinion), followed the more recent decisions.

  8. Raffaelli v. Committee of Bar Examiners

    7 Cal.3d 288 (Cal. 1972)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Raffaelli, the California Supreme Court struck down a California statute excluding aliens from admission to the State Bar.

  9. Piper v. Big Pine School District of Inyo County

    193 Cal. 664 (Cal. 1924)   Cited 48 times
    In Piper v. Big Pine School Dist. (1924) 193 Cal. 664 [ 226 P. 926], for example, this court applied the free school guarantee to invalidate a school district's policy of excluding Native American children from the public schools.

  10. Section 1621 - Aliens who are not qualified aliens or nonimmigrants ineligible for State and local public benefits

    8 U.S.C. § 1621   Cited 103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting the U.S. Attorney General sole discretion to exempt certain state or local public benefits from PRWORA’s restrictions

  11. Section 5

    Cal. Const. art. IX § 5   Cited 72 times

    The Legislature shall provide for a system of common schools by which a free school shall be kept up and supported in each district at least six months in every year, after the first year in which a school has been established. Cal. Const. art. IX § 5

  12. Section 6060.6 - Use of federal tax identification number in lieu of social security number

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6060.6   Cited 1 times

    Notwithstanding Section 30 of this code and Section 17520 of the Family Code, the Committee of Bar Examiners may accept for registration, and the State Bar may process for an original or renewed license to practice law, an application from an individual containing a federal tax identification number, or other appropriate identification number as determined by the State Bar, in lieu of a social security number, if the individual is not eligible for a social security account number at the time of application

  13. Section 123865 - Application if parents or estate of handicapped child unable to furnish necessary services; disclosure of individualized education program

    Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 123865

    If the parents or estate of a handicapped child is wholly or partly unable to furnish for the child necessary services, the parents or guardian may apply to the agency of the county that has been designated by the board of supervisors of the county of residence under the terms of Section 123850 to administer the provisions for handicapped children. Residence shall be determined in accordance with Sections 243 and 244 of the Government Code. Ca. Health and Saf. Code § 123865 Amended by Stats 2012