§Why CasetextPricing

ROSE v. BANK OF AMERICA (Mauro, J., assigned justice pro tempore; Chin, J., not participating)

Respondent’s Exhibits in Support of Request for Judicial Notice

114 Cited authorities

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,610 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

    401 U.S. 424 (1971)   Cited 2,761 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 703(h) does not protect use of testing requirements with a disparate impact on racial minorities where the tests were not shown to be related to job performance

  3. Fleet Factors Corp. v. U.S.

    498 U.S. 1046 (1991)   Cited 199 times
    Holding that in the commercial mining context, no knowledge requirement must be met in order to convict parties of mining without the appropriate permits

  4. U.S. v. Fleet Factors Corp.

    901 F.2d 1550 (11th Cir. 1990)   Cited 84 times
    Holding that § 9607 imposes strict liability

  5. Rodash v. AIB Mortgage Co.

    16 F.3d 1142 (11th Cir. 1994)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that the sender’s subjective intent and recipient’s misunderstanding of the notice required under the Truth in Lending Act ("TILA") was irrelevant to compliance with that requirement

  6. United States v. Maryland Bank Trust Co.

    632 F. Supp. 573 (D. Md. 1986)   Cited 43 times
    Holding that a security interest existing solely as the result of a loan vesting the interest holder with an indicia of ownership was not a basis for CERCLA liability

  7. Guidice v. BFG Electroplating & Manufacturing Co.

    732 F. Supp. 556 (W.D. Pa. 1989)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that doctrine does not apply where prior orders have been vacated

  8. Section 1601 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1601   Cited 7,796 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that TILA's disclosure requirements exist “so that the consumer will be able to compare more readily the various credit terms available to him and avoid the uninformed use of credit”

  9. Section 1681 - Congressional findings and statement of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1681   Cited 6,282 times   190 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the need to protect "the consumer's right to privacy"

  10. Section 1640 - Civil liability

    15 U.S.C. § 1640   Cited 4,910 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding "any creditor who fails to comply" liable, with creditors defined within § 1602(g) as persons

  11. Section 9601 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 9601   Cited 4,265 times   128 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition of “disposal” contained in the Solid Waste Disposal Act

  12. Section 3601 - Declaration of policy

    42 U.S.C. § 3601   Cited 3,984 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Stating the FHA is intended to provide “fair housing throughout the United States”

  13. Section 2605 - Servicing of mortgage loans and administration of escrow accounts

    12 U.S.C. § 2605   Cited 3,716 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Describing "qualified written request"

  14. Section 1251 - Congressional declaration of goals and policy

    33 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 3,541 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Designating the Administrator of the EPA to "administer this chapter"

  15. Section 2601 - Congressional findings and purpose

    12 U.S.C. § 2601   Cited 3,436 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Providing purpose of RESPA is "to effect certain changes in the settlement process for residential real estate"

  16. Section 1635 - Right of rescission as to certain transactions

    15 U.S.C. § 1635   Cited 3,303 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Granting consumers the right to rescind

  17. Section 9613 - Civil proceedings

    42 U.S.C. § 9613   Cited 2,174 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal district courts "exclusive original jurisdiction" of CERCLA actions

  18. Section 226.18 - Content of disclosures

    12 C.F.R. § 226.18   Cited 531 times
    Listing the required disclosures for variable rate

  19. Section 226.3 - Exempt transactions

    12 C.F.R. § 226.3   Cited 120 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that Regulation Z does not apply to "[ a]n extension of credit primarily for a business, commercial or agricultural purpose"

  20. Rule 8.29 - Service on nonparty public officer or agency

    Cal. R. 8.29   Cited 6 times

    (a)Proof of service When a statute or this rule requires a party to serve any document on a nonparty public officer or agency, the party must file proof of such service with the document unless a statute permits service after the document is filed, in which case the proof of service must be filed immediately after the document is served on the public officer or agency. (Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (b).) (b)Identification on cover When a statute or this rule requires