8 Cited authorities

  1. Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    535 U.S. 137 (2002)   Cited 298 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law
  2. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 366 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
  3. Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.

    364 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 286 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding magistrate judge's entry of protective order precluding defendant employer from using discovery process to support after-acquired evidence defense proper, noting that "the McKennon Court did not hold that depositions could be conducted for the purpose of uncovering illegal actions."
  4. Balbuena v. IDR Realty LLC

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1248 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 124 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "plaintiffs' status as aliens who are not legally authorized to work in the United States" did not preclude their recovery of lost earning in their suit to recover for injuries sustained as a result of defendants' purported violations of state Labor Law
  5. Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board

    316 U.S. 31 (1942)   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”
  6. Abel Verdon Construction v. Rivera

    348 S.W.3d 749 (Ky. 2011)   Cited 43 times
    Finding that substantial evidence supported ALJ's conclusion that claimant was an employee where claimant's work was within the scope of the employer's business; the employer controlled the work being performed; and the work did not require any particular skill
  7. Grocers Supply, Inc. v. Cabello

    390 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. App. 2012)   Cited 17 times
    Affirming awards for lost wages in a negligence case
  8. Farmer Brothers Coffee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    133 Cal.App.4th 533 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that this statute was not preempted by IRCA