8 Cited authorities

  1. Ketchum v. Moses

    24 Cal.4th 1122 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,138 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the party seeking a fee enhancement bears the burden of proof
  2. Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

    7 Cal.4th 1057 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 249 times
    Holding that a suit to enjoin the "Old Joe Camel" cigarette advertising campaign targeting minors pursuant to California state law is not preempted by the Federal Act
  3. In re Tobacco Cases II

    41 Cal.4th 1257 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that only relevant material may be judicially noticed
  4. Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

    196 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 93 times
    Reversing grant of summary judgment because the trial court improperly noticed statements of the truth of recited facts within the recorded documents
  5. Brosterhous v. State Bar

    12 Cal.4th 315 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 123 times
    Recognizing "intent of Congress that section 1983 claims be judicially resolved."
  6. Varjabedian v. City of Madera

    20 Cal.3d 285 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 170 times
    Noting "those core cases of direct physical invasion which indisputably require compensation"
  7. Mozzetti v. City of Brisbane

    67 Cal.App.3d 565 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977)   Cited 80 times
    Recognizing there is no fixed, inflexible rule for determining the measure of damages for injury to or destruction of property and whatever formula is most appropriate in a particular case will be adopted
  8. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 1,535 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or