8 Cited authorities

  1. Ketchum v. Moses

    24 Cal.4th 1122 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,729 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the party seeking a fee enhancement bears the burden of proof
  2. Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

    7 Cal.4th 1057 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that a suit to enjoin the "Old Joe Camel" cigarette advertising campaign targeting minors pursuant to California state law is not preempted by the Federal Act
  3. In re Tobacco Cases II

    41 Cal.4th 1257 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 185 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Tobacco Cases II, we held that, as a general matter, the UCL is not subject to preemption on its face by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (15 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq.), which governs cigarette sales to minors, because it "is a law of general application, and it is not based on concerns about smoking and health."
  4. Brosterhous v. State Bar

    12 Cal.4th 315 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 175 times
    Recognizing "intent of Congress that section 1983 claims be judicially resolved."
  5. Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

    196 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 101 times
    Reversing grant of summary judgment because the trial court improperly noticed statements of the truth of recited facts within the recorded documents
  6. Varjabedian v. City of Madera

    20 Cal.3d 285 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 248 times
    Noting "those core cases of direct physical invasion which indisputably require compensation"
  7. Mozzetti v. City of Brisbane

    67 Cal.App.3d 565 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977)   Cited 106 times
    Recognizing there is no fixed, inflexible rule for determining the measure of damages for injury to or destruction of property and whatever formula is most appropriate in a particular case will be adopted
  8. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,127 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or