§Why CasetextPricing

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF v. S.C. (ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION)

Real Party in Interest, Engineers & Architects Association, Supplemental Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. Matosantos

    53 Cal.4th 231 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 184 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that legislation dissolving community redevelopment agencies is constitutional and establishing a dissolution date of February 1, 2012, for all agencies.

  2. Retired Employees Assn. of Orange County, Inc. v. County of Orange

    52 Cal.4th 1171 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 134 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Clarifying that county law encompasses "Board resolutions, including those resolutions approving or ratifying MOUs"

  3. Eng. Architects Assn. v. Community Dev. Dept

    30 Cal.App.4th 644 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 148 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Engineers, supra, 30 Cal.App.4th 644, the court considered the arbitrability of a grievance brought by a public employees’ organization under similar circumstances.

  4. Professional Engineers in California Govt. v. Schwarzenegger

    50 Cal.4th 989 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the argument the governor had the unilateral authority to implement a mandatory furlough program

  5. Sonoma County Org. of Pub. Employees v. Cty. of Sonoma

    23 Cal.3d 296 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 133 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state statute capping local governmental employees' contractual cost-of-living wage increases violated the Contract Clause because the state's supposedly "grave fiscal crisis" did not actually constitute a significant and legitimate public purpose

  6. Fire Fighters Union v. City of Vallejo

    12 Cal.3d 608 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 116 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Fire Fighters Union v. City of Vallejo (1974) 12 Cal.3d 608, 116 Cal.Rptr. 507, 526 P.2d 971, we rejected a nondelegation challenge to a Vallejo city charter provision that permitted an arbitral board to resolve disputed terms of employment after considering " ‘all factors relevant to the issues from the standpoint of both the employer and the employee, including the City's financial condition.’ "

  7. International Assn. of Fire Fighters, Local 188, Afl-Cio v. Public Employment Relations Bd.

    51 Cal.4th 259 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 32 times
    Applying balancing test from First National , supra , 452 U.S. at pp. 676–680, 101 S.Ct. 2573

  8. Balandran v. Labor Ready, Inc.

    124 Cal.App.4th 1522 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 35 times
    In Balandran, the "including" clause referred to the types of employment claims that were covered by the agreement, e.g., discrimination and/or harassment claims.

  9. Claremont Police Officers Assn. v. City of Claremont

    39 Cal.4th 623 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 31 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the same test applies to the implementation of fundamental managerial and policy decisions

  10. O'Malley v. Wilshire Oil Co.

    59 Cal.2d 482 (Cal. 1963)   Cited 64 times
    In O'Malley v. Wilshire Oil Co. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 482, 486 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 452, 381 P.2d 188], this court recognized both the unique nature of labor arbitration and the fact that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Enterprise was based on "the special nature of the collective bargaining agreement and the crucial role of the arbitrator in resolving disputes arising under it...."