§Why CasetextPricing

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF v. S.C. (ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION)

Real Party in Interest, Engineers & Architects Association, Reply to Supplemental Brief

16 Cited authorities

  1. Eng. Architects Assn. v. Community Dev. Dept

    30 Cal.App.4th 644 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 148 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Engineers, supra, 30 Cal.App.4th 644, the court considered the arbitrability of a grievance brought by a public employees’ organization under similar circumstances.

  2. Glendale City Employees' Assn., Inc. v. City of Glendale

    15 Cal.3d 328 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 183 times
    Stating that once an MOU is approved by a governmental body, it becomes a binding agreement

  3. Professional Engineers in California Govt. v. Schwarzenegger

    50 Cal.4th 989 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the argument the governor had the unilateral authority to implement a mandatory furlough program

  4. Sonoma County Org. of Pub. Employees v. Cty. of Sonoma

    23 Cal.3d 296 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 133 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state statute capping local governmental employees' contractual cost-of-living wage increases violated the Contract Clause because the state's supposedly "grave fiscal crisis" did not actually constitute a significant and legitimate public purpose

  5. Fire Fighters Union v. City of Vallejo

    12 Cal.3d 608 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 116 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Fire Fighters Union v. City of Vallejo (1974) 12 Cal.3d 608, 116 Cal.Rptr. 507, 526 P.2d 971, we rejected a nondelegation challenge to a Vallejo city charter provision that permitted an arbitral board to resolve disputed terms of employment after considering " ‘all factors relevant to the issues from the standpoint of both the employer and the employee, including the City's financial condition.’ "

  6. Voters for Responsible Retirement v. Board of Supervisors

    8 Cal.4th 765 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 61 times

    Docket No. S034268. November 23, 1994. Appeal from Superior Court of Trinity County, No. 92CV021, Steven E. Jahr, Judge. Judge of the Shasta Superior Court sitting under assignment by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. COUNSEL Alfred S. Wilkins for Plaintiff and Appellant. John W. Anderson, County Counsel, David L. Cross, District Attorney, and W. James Wood, Deputy District Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents. Lita O'Neill Blatner, County Counsel (Tulare), Kathleen Bales-Lange, Deputy

  7. International Assn. of Fire Fighters, Local 188, Afl-Cio v. Public Employment Relations Bd.

    51 Cal.4th 259 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 32 times
    Applying balancing test from First National , supra , 452 U.S. at pp. 676–680, 101 S.Ct. 2573

  8. United Teachers of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

    54 Cal.4th 504 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 19 times
    In United Teachers, a school district approved conversion of an existing public school into a charter school, after which a teachers' union filed grievances claiming that the district had not complied with their collective bargaining agreement's provisions relating to charter school conversions.

  9. Taylor v. Crane

    24 Cal.3d 442 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 46 times
    Upholding an arbitrator's ruling that a police officer who had been discharged should be reinstated where a collective bargaining agreement between the police and the City provided for arbitration of grievances

  10. In re David S.

    133 Cal.App.4th 1160 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 10 times

    No. A109703 October 31, 2005 Appeal from the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, No. J04-00742, George Spanos, Judge. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Laurence K. Sullivan and Martin S. Kaye, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Law Offices of Paul Delano Wolf, Paul Delano Wolf, Lynn M. Keslar and Aminder Singh for Defendant and Appellant. JONES, P.J. David S. appeals the dispositional