4 Cited authorities

  1. Schifando v. City of Los Angeles

    31 Cal.4th 1074 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,254 times
    Denying request where the materials sought to be judicially noticed were not particularly supportive of the respondent's cause or relevant to the action and noting that "[n]o party has alleged" what the amicus curiae had purported to respond to
  2. Williams v. Schwartz

    61 Cal.App.3d 628 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 16 times
    In Williams v. Schwartz (1976) 61 Cal.App.3d 628, 631 et seq. [ 131 Cal.Rptr. 200], the court, relying on consortium cases, held that action for infliction of emotional distress for negligence of the spouse's employer in injuring the spouse was precluded by the broad language of the exclusive remedy provisions limiting the employer's liability.
  3. Danek v. Hommer

    9 N.J. 56 (N.J. 1952)   Cited 48 times
    Finding that the WCA prevented a husband from maintaining an action against his wife's employer for loss of consortium as a result of her workplace injury
  4. Gillespie v. Northridge Hosp. Foundation

    20 Cal.App.3d 867 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)   Cited 14 times
    Referring to common law derivative rights