37 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 17,394 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"
  2. Melendez–Diaz v. Massachusetts

    557 U.S. 305 (2009)   Cited 3,545 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a certification that material seized by the police included cocaine was testimonial
  3. Morrissey v. Brewer

    408 U.S. 471 (1972)   Cited 10,670 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that parolees "must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation"
  4. Gagnon v. Scarpelli

    411 U.S. 778 (1973)   Cited 5,194 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that probation revocation is not a stage of criminal prosecution
  5. Black v. Romano

    471 U.S. 606 (1985)   Cited 642 times
    Holding that a probationer is generally not entitled to "the full panoply of procedural safeguards associated with a criminal trial"
  6. People v. Galvan

    155 Cal.App.4th 978 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 265 times
    Reversing probation revocation decision due to lack of evidence as to when defendant reentered the country
  7. Doe v. City of Los Angeles

    42 Cal.4th 531 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 254 times
    Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."
  8. Elsner v. Uveges

    34 Cal.4th 915 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 274 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding enrolled bill reports prepared after a bill's passage instructive on matters of legislative intent
  9. People v. Epps

    25 Cal.4th 19 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 292 times
    Recognizing statutory right to jury trial on whether prior conviction occurred under §§ 1025 & 1158
  10. People v. Trujillo

    40 Cal.4th 165 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 243 times
    Concluding defendant’s statements, made after guilty plea accepted & contained in RPO prepared after guilty plea accepted, are not part of record of prior conviction because such statements do not reflect facts of offense for which defendant convicted
  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer