37 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 14,695 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"
  2. Melendez–Diaz v. Massachusetts

    557 U.S. 305 (2009)   Cited 2,982 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a certification that material seized by the police included cocaine was testimonial
  3. Morrissey v. Brewer

    408 U.S. 471 (1972)   Cited 9,577 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the minimum requirements of due process" in a parole revocation proceeding include "the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses"
  4. Gagnon v. Scarpelli

    411 U.S. 778 (1973)   Cited 4,519 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that probation revocation is not a stage of criminal prosecution
  5. Black v. Romano

    471 U.S. 606 (1985)   Cited 557 times
    Holding that basic requirements include a hearing, a neutral hearing body, written notice of claimed violations, disclosure of evidence, an opportunity to testify, an opportunity to confront witnesses and, in some cases, the assistance of counsel
  6. Doe v. City of Los Angeles

    42 Cal.4th 531 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 194 times
    Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."
  7. People v. Galvan

    155 Cal.App.4th 978 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 187 times
    In People v. Galvan, supra, 155 Cal.App.4th 978, the appellate court held that the defendant's failure to report to probation within 24 hours of his release from custody was not willful where it was caused by his immediate deportation by the federal government.
  8. Elsner v. Uveges

    34 Cal.4th 915 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 202 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Finding enrolled bill reports prepared after a bill's passage instructive on matters of legislative intent
  9. People v. Feyrer

    48 Cal.4th 426 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 174 times
    Finding it evident that a wobbler reduced to a misdemeanor under § 17(b) after suspension of imposition of sentence could be used as a prior felony conviction under the Three Strikes law in the event the defendant were to suffer a subsequent felony conviction
  10. People v. Trujillo

    40 Cal.4th 165 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 162 times
    Approving the court's earlier ruling that in determining whether a prior conviction is for a "serious felony," the trial court may look only to the record of the conviction
  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 236 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer