§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. MANZO

Respondent's Opening Brief on the Merits

27 Cited authorities

  1. Moskal v. United States

    498 U.S. 103 (1990)   Cited 559 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the rule of lenity is not triggered because it is "possible to articulate" a narrower construction of a statute

  2. People v. Anderson

    43 Cal.3d 1104 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 623 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proving intent to kill is not required when the defendant is the actual killer, but it is required when the defendant is an accomplice

  3. People v. Jefferson

    21 Cal.4th 86 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 409 times
    Holding that the minimum 15-year term of imprisonment required under a criminal street gang provision set the minimum term for a sentence and was not a sentence enhancement

  4. People v. Avery

    27 Cal.4th 49 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 376 times
    Allowing courts to look to the entire record of conviction to determine whether the out-of-state conduct constitutes a "serious felony" under Three Strikes

  5. People v. Murphy

    25 Cal.4th 136 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 337 times
    Holding that the Three Strikes sentencing scheme applied in addition to other sentencing enhancements because the phrase "notwithstanding any other law" was unambiguous

  6. People v. Canty

    32 Cal.4th 1266 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 246 times
    In Canty, the Supreme Court considered whether a defendant convicted of transporting methamphetamine, a felony, and driving a vehicle while under the influence of a controlled substance, a misdemeanor, has been “ ‘convicted in the same proceeding of a misdemeanor not related to the use of drugs' ” within the meaning of section 1210.1, subdivision (b)(2), and section 1210, subdivision (d).

  7. People v. Ramirez

    45 Cal.4th 980 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 201 times
    Holding that discharging a firearm in a grossly negligent manner is a necessarily included lesser offense of shooting at an inhabited dwelling house

  8. People v. Cruz

    38 Cal.App.4th 427 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 211 times
    In People v. Cruz (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 427 (Cruz), a defendant fired four shots at a security guard standing inside the front glass door; one shot missed the guard's head by inches.

  9. Curle v. Superior Court

    24 Cal.4th 1057 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 170 times
    Stating that courts must construe "portions of a statute in the context of the entire statute and the statutory scheme of which it is a part"

  10. People v. Hansen

    9 Cal.4th 300 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 201 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the crime of willfully discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling is an inherently dangerous felony for purposes of the second degree felony murder rule