31 Cited authorities

United States v. Wade
388 U.S. 218 (1967) Cited 8,065 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Sixth Amendment provides the right to counsel at a postindictment lineup even though the Fifth Amendment is not implicated
Estelle v. Smith
451 U.S. 454 (1981) Cited 1,564 times 30 Legal Analyses
Holding that a psychiatrist's testimony about the defendant's future dangerousness in a capital felony trial violated the defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights where the defendant was not given Miranda warnings before his psychiatric examination
People v. Sandoval
41 Cal.4th 825 (Cal. 2007) Cited 2,270 times
Holding that judicial discretion to impose a lower, middle, or upper term complied with Cunningham
Buchanan v. Kentucky
483 U.S. 402 (1987) Cited 504 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prosecution’s use of rebuttal expert testimony is permissible where a defendant “presents psychiatric evidence”
People v. Richardson
43 Cal.4th 959 (Cal. 2008) Cited 867 times 3 Legal Analyses
Upholding instruction where defendant had attempted to conceal evidence of drawings by the 11-year-old victim that had defendant's nickname on them showing that he had been a recent visitor to the murder victim's residence
People v. Carpenter
15 Cal.4th 312 (Cal. 1997) Cited 1,088 times
Holding that a defendant could not raise an equal protection challenge for the first time on appeal
People v. Poggi
45 Cal.3d 306 (Cal. 1988) Cited 523 times 2 Legal Analyses
Upholding admission of statement made 30 minutes after attack when victim had calmed down
Verdin v. Superior Court
43 Cal.4th 1096 (Cal. 2008) Cited 282 times
Finding the court's order to be error
Tapia v. Superior Court
53 Cal.3d 282 (Cal. 1991) Cited 463 times 2 Legal Analyses
Concluding that provisions of Proposition 115 affecting the conduct of criminal trials can constitutionally be applied to trial of a crime committed before its enactment
People v. McPeters
2 Cal.4th 1148 (Cal. 1992) Cited 443 times
Concluding an error was harmless because the "defendant's guilt was established by the testimony of numerous eyewitnesses as well as corroborating physical evidence, and . . . defendant's credibility was undermined by his own inherently improbable testimony denying any connection to the murder"

SHARP v. S.C. (PEOPLE)

31 Cited authorities

Holding that the Sixth Amendment provides the right to counsel at a postindictment lineup even though the Fifth Amendment is not implicated

Holding that a psychiatrist's testimony about the defendant's future dangerousness in a capital felony trial violated the defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights where the defendant was not given Miranda warnings before his psychiatric examination

Holding that judicial discretion to impose a lower, middle, or upper term complied with Cunningham

Holding that the prosecution’s use of rebuttal expert testimony is permissible where a defendant “presents psychiatric evidence”

Upholding instruction where defendant had attempted to conceal evidence of drawings by the 11-year-old victim that had defendant's nickname on them showing that he had been a recent visitor to the murder victim's residence

Holding that a defendant could not raise an equal protection challenge for the first time on appeal

Upholding admission of statement made 30 minutes after attack when victim had calmed down

Finding the court's order to be error

Concluding that provisions of Proposition 115 affecting the conduct of criminal trials can constitutionally be applied to trial of a crime committed before its enactment

Concluding an error was harmless because the "defendant's guilt was established by the testimony of numerous eyewitnesses as well as corroborating physical evidence, and . . . defendant's credibility was undermined by his own inherently improbable testimony denying any connection to the murder"