27 Cited authorities

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (2000) Cited 26,625 times 100 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (1972) Cited 10,670 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that parolees "must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation"
Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates
455 U.S. 489 (1982) Cited 3,175 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the possible inhibition of a constitutional right is "perhaps the most important factor"
Grayned v. City of Rockford
408 U.S. 104 (1972) Cited 4,708 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute's words, even when "marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth, rather than meticulous specificity," are clear based on "what the ordinance as a whole prohibits"
Shapiro v. Thompson
394 U.S. 618 (1969) Cited 2,287 times
Holding a federal law that applied to residents of the District of Columbia violated the right to travel
United States v. Mazurie
419 U.S. 544 (1975) Cited 861 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Congress, which regulated the introduction of alcoholic beverages in "Indian country" could validly delegate to Indian tribes its authority to regulate that subject matter because Indian tribes themselves possessed independent authority over the subject matter
Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court
57 Cal.2d 450 (Cal. 1962) Cited 5,905 times 8 Legal Analyses
Explaining the "rule requiring a court exercising inferior jurisdiction to follow the decisions of a court exercising a higher jurisdiction"
Connally v. General Const. Co.
269 U.S. 385 (1926) Cited 2,758 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute violates due process for vagueness if “men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application”
People v. Lent
15 Cal.3d 481 (Cal. 1975) Cited 1,696 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a probationer who agreed to a search term cannot avoid an imminent search by refusing law enforcement permission to conduct it
Meyer v. Nebraska
262 U.S. 390 (1923) Cited 2,664 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding a Nebraska statute prohibiting the teaching of any subject in any language other than the English language unconstitutional
Section 288 - Lewd or lascivious act upon child under age of 14 years
Cal. Pen. Code § 288 Cited 9,304 times 1 Legal Analyses
Defining crime of conviction
Section 288a - [Renumbered]
Cal. Pen. Code § 288a Cited 3,506 times 1 Legal Analyses
Defining oral copulation as "the act of copulating the mouth of one person with the sexual organ or anus of another person"
Section 286 - Sodomy
Cal. Pen. Code § 286 Cited 1,954 times
Defining sodomy
Section 3003.5 - Restriction on residency
Cal. Pen. Code § 3003.5 Cited 160 times
Making violation of residency restriction “unlawful”
Section 13663 - Ineligibility of dangerous sex offenders for admission to public housing
42 U.S.C. § 13663 Cited 29 times 2 Legal Analyses
Prohibiting those who are subject to a lifetime registration requirement from public housing

PEOPLE v. MOSLEY

27 Cited authorities

Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”

Holding that parolees "must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation"

Holding that the possible inhibition of a constitutional right is "perhaps the most important factor"

Holding that a statute's words, even when "marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth, rather than meticulous specificity," are clear based on "what the ordinance as a whole prohibits"

Holding a federal law that applied to residents of the District of Columbia violated the right to travel

Holding that Congress, which regulated the introduction of alcoholic beverages in "Indian country" could validly delegate to Indian tribes its authority to regulate that subject matter because Indian tribes themselves possessed independent authority over the subject matter

Explaining the "rule requiring a court exercising inferior jurisdiction to follow the decisions of a court exercising a higher jurisdiction"

Holding that a statute violates due process for vagueness if “men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application”

Holding that a probationer who agreed to a search term cannot avoid an imminent search by refusing law enforcement permission to conduct it

Holding a Nebraska statute prohibiting the teaching of any subject in any language other than the English language unconstitutional

Defining crime of conviction

Defining oral copulation as "the act of copulating the mouth of one person with the sexual organ or anus of another person"

Defining sodomy

Making violation of residency restriction “unlawful”

Prohibiting those who are subject to a lifetime registration requirement from public housing