27 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Holt

    15 Cal.4th 619 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 1,786 times
    Holding that the failure to record statements did not violate the due process clause of either the state or federal constitution
  2. People v. Mendoza Tello

    15 Cal.4th 264 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 1,634 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding in substance that ineffectiveness claim was "hybrid" in nature and reversing intermediate appellate holding that error was of "record" variety that required reversal
  3. People v. Marsden

    2 Cal.3d 118 (Cal. 1970)   Cited 4,768 times
    Holding that a trial judge must permit a criminal defendant requesting substitute counsel an opportunity to present argument and evidence in support of such request
  4. The People v. McCoy

    25 Cal.4th 1111 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 956 times
    Recognizing that “[w]hen two or more persons commit a crime together, both may act in part as the actual perpetrator and in part as the aider and abettor of the other, who also acts in part as an actual perpetrator”
  5. In re Frank S.

    141 Cal.App.4th 1192 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 568 times
    Finding the minor had carried concealed weapon for the benefit of a gang was reversed where only evidence was gang expert's testimony the minor would have used the knife to protect himself from and attack rival gang members
  6. Renee J. v. Superior Court (Orange County Social Services Agency)

    26 Cal.4th 735 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 656 times
    Noting the Legislature's provision of six months of reunification services when the child is under age three at the time of removal from the physical custody of the parent
  7. People v. Parson

    44 Cal.4th 332 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 426 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[a]n intent to commit theft by a false pretense or a false promise without the intent to perform will support a burglary conviction” and finding substantial evidence to support burglary conviction when defendant entered victim's home intending to “ ‘con’ ” her out of money
  8. People v. Martinez

    158 Cal.App.4th 1324 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 382 times
    Holding two gang members who committed a robbery did so "in association with" the gang
  9. People v. Castenada

    23 Cal.4th 743 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 436 times
    Finding that legislature's wording of "actively participates," as contained in Cal. Penal Code § 186.22, is not void for vagueness
  10. People v. Avena

    13 Cal.4th 394 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 449 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting assumption lengthy penalty deliberations indicated jury had difficulty reaching decision
  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 305 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer