Terry v. Ohio

Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

Rakas v. Illinois

Holding that the determinative question is "whether the person who claims the protection of the Amendment has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place"

Illinois v. Rodriguez

Holding that a search is not rendered unreasonable because an officer reasonably, but erroneously, believed that he had received consent from someone capable of providing it

Samson v. California

Holding that a similarly worded condition imposed on all California parolees did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even without the reasonable suspicion restriction

United States v. Matlock

Holding that the government "may show that permission to search was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effects sought to be inspected"

South Dakota v. Opperman

Holding that an inventory search was constitutionally permissible in part because there was "no suggestion" that the search "was a pretext concealing an investigatory police motive"

Wyoming v. Houghton

Holding that a search of an automobile and the containers within it is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if the officers have probable cause to believe the automobile contains contraband

People v. Ledesma

Finding nothing improper about the prosecutor questioning defense witnesses about the defendant’s motive to plead guilty to rebut defendant’s claim that he pled guilty to accept responsibility

People v. Souza

Finding probable cause for warrantless detention and explaining, " different result is not warranted merely because circumstances known to an officer may also be' "consistent with lawful activity"' "

People v. Reyes

Holding based on balancing of the special compelling government interests in supervising probationer against the significantly diminished expectation of privacy of probationers that Fourth Amendment reasonableness does not necessarily require particularized suspicion of a criminal law or probation violation for warrantless probation searches as long as reasonably related to those special interests and not otherwise unreasonable in frequency, time of day, duration, or other reasons that are arbitrary or oppressive under the circumstances

Rule 8.500 - Petition for review