31 Cited authorities

  1. Terry v. Ohio

    392 U.S. 1 (1968)   Cited 34,217 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop
  2. Rakas v. Illinois

    439 U.S. 128 (1978)   Cited 5,794 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the determinative question is "whether the person who claims the protection of the Amendment has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place"
  3. Illinois v. Rodriguez

    497 U.S. 177 (1990)   Cited 2,495 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a search is not rendered unreasonable because an officer reasonably, but erroneously, believed that he had received consent from someone capable of providing it
  4. Samson v. California

    547 U.S. 843 (2006)   Cited 1,039 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a similarly worded condition imposed on all California parolees did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even without the reasonable suspicion restriction
  5. United States v. Matlock

    415 U.S. 164 (1974)   Cited 3,685 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government "may show that permission to search was obtained from a third party who possessed common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effects sought to be inspected"
  6. South Dakota v. Opperman

    428 U.S. 364 (1976)   Cited 2,702 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an inventory search was constitutionally permissible in part because there was "no suggestion" that the search "was a pretext concealing an investigatory police motive"
  7. Wyoming v. Houghton

    526 U.S. 295 (1999)   Cited 806 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a search of an automobile and the containers within it is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if the officers have probable cause to believe the automobile contains contraband
  8. People v. Ledesma

    39 Cal.4th 641 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 775 times
    Finding nothing improper about the prosecutor questioning defense witnesses about the defendant’s motive to plead guilty to rebut defendant’s claim that he pled guilty to accept responsibility
  9. People v. Souza

    9 Cal.4th 224 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 487 times
    Finding reasonable suspicion to detain where suspect in unlit, high-crime area late at night fled when officer shined spotlight on him, and his companions also ducked to avoid spotlight
  10. People v. Woods

    21 Cal.4th 668 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 346 times
    Holding that objective standard applies to parole searches to discourage disparate results resulting from validity of searches turning on officer's subjective intent
  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 238 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer