Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson
513 U.S. 265 (1995) Cited 1,599 times 12 Legal AnalysesHolding that term "involving commerce" reflects "an intent to exercise Congress' commerce power to the full"
D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners
11 Cal.3d 1 (Cal. 1974) Cited 1,061 timesIn D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners, 11 Cal.3d 1, 112 Cal.Rptr. 786, 520 P.2d 10 (Cal. 1974), the state Supreme Court held that the 1962 initiative Act's prohibition of future licensing of osteopaths violated the Equal Protection Clause of both the federal and state constitutions, because the state could not demonstrate a rational relation to a legitimate governmental objective.
Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn
8 Cal.4th 361 (Cal. 1994) Cited 201 timesFinding that a deed restriction prohibiting the use of satellite dishes "is not a disfavored restriction on the alienation of property," and thus was not affected by Civil Code § 711
Grafton Partners v. Superior Court
36 Cal.4th 944 (Cal. 2005) Cited 118 times 21 Legal AnalysesHolding that right to jury trial may only be waived as prescribed by California legislature and listing methods allowed for such waivers
Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Ass'n v. Superior Court
166 Cal.App.4th 1055 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 31 times 5 Legal AnalysesNoting 1982 amendment to section 638 allowing “parties by written contract ... to agree that any controversy arising therefrom be heard by reference ... was an attempt to lessen judicial delays that were at the time a serious problem”
Villa Milano Homeowners Assoc. v. Davorge
84 Cal.App.4th 819 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 39 times 2 Legal AnalysesFinding procedural unconscionability “obvious” where condominium purchasers had no opportunity to negotiate declaration's terms
Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate
9 U.S.C. § 2 Cited 10,837 times 115 Legal AnalysesGranting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"