70 Cited authorities

  1. Ward v. Rock Against Racism

    491 U.S. 781 (1989)   Cited 2,409 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the validity of a provision challenged on an as-applied basis "depends on the relation it bears to the overall problem the government seeks to correct, not on the extent to which it furthers the government's interests in an individual case"
  2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 6,282 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  3. R.A.V. v. St. Paul

    505 U.S. 377 (1992)   Cited 1,365 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional on First Amendment grounds a law criminalizing conduct such as placing a burning cross or Nazi swastika, which one knows to arouse anger, alarm, or resentment on the basis of race, religion, etc.
  4. Cornelius v. Naacp Legal Defense Ed. Fund

    473 U.S. 788 (1985)   Cited 1,296 times
    Holding that a charitable fundraising drive conducted in a federal workplace was a nonpublic forum
  5. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic

    547 U.S. 47 (2006)   Cited 510 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing about having military recruiters on campus "suggests that law schools agree with any speech by recruiters"
  6. Rust v. Sullivan

    500 U.S. 173 (1991)   Cited 801 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "longstanding" agency interpretation was no longer entitled to Chevron deference given that the agency had changed its position on the issue
  7. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian Bisexual Group

    515 U.S. 557 (1995)   Cited 576 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a marcher's message will likely be attributed to the parade organizer's, since "every participating unit" in a parade "affects the [overall] message"
  8. Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

    408 U.S. 92 (1972)   Cited 1,215 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment
  9. Carey v. Brown

    447 U.S. 455 (1980)   Cited 686 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ordinance violated equal protection where it banned all residential picketing except picketing of a place of employment involved in a labor dispute
  10. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins

    447 U.S. 74 (1980)   Cited 671 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"
  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 4,879 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
  12. Section 104 - Enumeration of specific acts not subject to restraining orders or injunctions

    29 U.S.C. § 104   Cited 554 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting injunctions of labor speech unless "involving fraud or violence"
  13. Section 107 - Issuance of injunctions in labor disputes; hearing; findings of court; notice to affected persons; temporary restraining order; undertakings

    29 U.S.C. § 107   Cited 326 times
    Requiring hearing prior to issuance of an injunction in labor disputes
  14. Section 15 - Repealed

    29 U.S.C. § 15   Cited 16 times

    29 U.S.C. § 15 Pub. L. 89-554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 644 Section, act June 5, 1920, ch. 248, §4, 41 Stat. 987, authorized employment by Woman's Bureau of Department of Labor of such employees at such rates of compensation as Congress may provide by appropriation.

  15. Rule 8.278 - Costs on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.278   Cited 2,819 times

    (a)Award of costs (1) Except as provided in this rule, the party prevailing in the Court of Appeal in a civil case other than a juvenile case is entitled to costs on appeal. (2) The prevailing party is the respondent if the Court of Appeal affirms the judgment without modification or dismisses the appeal. The prevailing party is the appellant if the court reverses the judgment in its entirety. (3) If the Court of Appeal reverses the judgment in part or modifies it, or if there is more than one notice

  16. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 222 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

  17. Rule 8.29 - Service on nonparty public officer or agency

    Cal. R. 8.29   Cited 6 times

    (a)Proof of service When a statute or this rule requires a party to serve any document on a nonparty public officer or agency, the party must file proof of such service with the document unless a statute permits service after the document is filed, in which case the proof of service must be filed immediately after the document is served on the public officer or agency. (Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (b).) (b)Identification on cover When a statute or this rule requires