§Why CasetextPricing

RALPHS GROCERY v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION

Respondent’s Petition for Review

71 Cited authorities

  1. Ward v. Rock Against Racism

    491 U.S. 781 (1989)   Cited 2,851 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the validity of a provision challenged on an as-applied basis "depends on the relation it bears to the overall problem the government seeks to correct, not on the extent to which it furthers the government's interests in an individual case"

  2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 6,902 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice

  3. R.A.V. v. St. Paul

    505 U.S. 377 (1992)   Cited 1,610 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding the government may not "license one side of a debate to fight freestyle, while requiring the other to follow Marquis of Queensberry rules"

  4. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic

    547 U.S. 47 (2006)   Cited 804 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing about having military recruiters on campus "suggests that law schools agree with any speech by recruiters"

  5. Cornelius v. Naacp Legal Defense Ed. Fund

    473 U.S. 788 (1985)   Cited 1,537 times
    Holding that a charitable fundraising drive conducted in a federal workplace was a nonpublic forum

  6. Rust v. Sullivan

    500 U.S. 173 (1991)   Cited 864 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "longstanding" agency interpretation was no longer entitled to Chevron deference given that the agency had changed its position on the issue

  7. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian Bisexual Group

    515 U.S. 557 (1995)   Cited 694 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a marcher's message will likely be attributed to the parade organizer's, since "every participating unit" in a parade "affects the [overall] message"

  8. Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

    408 U.S. 92 (1972)   Cited 1,333 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment

  9. Carey v. Brown

    447 U.S. 455 (1980)   Cited 733 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ordinance violated equal protection where it banned all residential picketing except picketing of a place of employment involved in a labor dispute

  10. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins

    447 U.S. 74 (1980)   Cited 725 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,057 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

  12. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. I § 1   Cited 1,055 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing "[a]ll people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights," including the right of "privacy"

  13. Section 104 - Enumeration of specific acts not subject to restraining orders or injunctions

    29 U.S.C. § 104   Cited 578 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting injunctions of labor speech unless "involving fraud or violence"

  14. Section 2

    Cal. Const. art. I § 2   Cited 476 times
    Restricting prohibition to state-licensed “mental health providers”

  15. Section 107 - Issuance of injunctions in labor disputes; hearing; findings of court; notice to affected persons; temporary restraining order; undertakings

    29 U.S.C. § 107   Cited 339 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring hearing prior to issuance of an injunction in labor disputes

  16. Section 15 - Repealed

    29 U.S.C. § 15   Cited 41 times   1 Legal Analyses

    29 U.S.C. § 15 Pub. L. 89-554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 644 Section, act June 5, 1920, ch. 248, §4, 41 Stat. 987, authorized employment by Woman's Bureau of Department of Labor of such employees at such rates of compensation as Congress may provide by appropriation.

  17. Rule 8.278 - Costs on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.278   Cited 4,771 times

    (a)Award of costs (1) Except as provided in this rule, the party prevailing in the Court of Appeal in a civil case other than a juvenile case is entitled to costs on appeal. (2) The prevailing party is the respondent if the Court of Appeal affirms the judgment without modification or dismisses the appeal. The prevailing party is the appellant if the court reverses the judgment in its entirety. (3) If the Court of Appeal reverses the judgment in part or modifies it, or if there is more than one notice

  18. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

  19. Rule 8.29 - Service on nonparty public officer or agency

    Cal. R. 8.29   Cited 6 times

    (a)Proof of service When a statute or this rule requires a party to serve any document on a nonparty public officer or agency, the party must file proof of such service with the document unless a statute permits service after the document is filed, in which case the proof of service must be filed immediately after the document is served on the public officer or agency. (Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (b).) (b)Identification on cover When a statute or this rule requires