250 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 136,002 times   173 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prejudice for IAC claims requires showing "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different"
  2. United States v. Booker

    543 U.S. 220 (2005)   Cited 22,842 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory
  3. Apprendi v. New Jersey

    530 U.S. 466 (2000)   Cited 22,075 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
  4. Blakely v. Washington

    542 U.S. 296 (2004)   Cited 14,141 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[w]hen a judge inflicts punishment that the jury's verdict alone does not allow, the jury has not found all the facts ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment,’ and the judge exceeds his proper authority”
  5. Jackson v. Virginia

    443 U.S. 307 (1979)   Cited 70,285 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court must presume trier of fact resolved all inferences in favor of the prosecution "even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record"
  6. Estelle v. McGuire

    502 U.S. 62 (1991)   Cited 16,367 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal habeas court may not reexamine state court determinations of state law questions
  7. Ring v. Arizona

    536 U.S. 584 (2002)   Cited 4,630 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[i]f a State makes an increase in a defendant's authorized punishment contingent on the finding of a fact, that fact—no matter how the State labels it—must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt”
  8. Neder v. United States

    527 U.S. 1 (1999)   Cited 4,153 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the failure to submit an uncontested element of an offense to a jury may be harmless
  9. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 19,150 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
  10. Santosky v. Kramer

    455 U.S. 745 (1982)   Cited 7,313 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[b]efore a State may sever ... the rights of parents in their natural child, due process requires that the State support its allegations by at least clear and convincing evidence"
  11. Section 3 CCR 714-1-L-2 - DEALER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS, NEW AND USED (DEALER OWNED HOMES)

    3 Colo. Code Regs. § 714-1-L-2   Cited 1 times

    When a dealer is the seller of a new or used home, the following items shall appear in each written purchase agreement or as an attachment thereto: a. The date of the agreement to purchase. b. A description of the manufactured home that is sold and purchased including make, year, serial number and size. In case of a factory order the letters "F.O." will be used in lieu of the serial number. c. The name and address of the licensee. d. The name and address of the purchaser. e. The sales price, together