§Why CasetextPricing

STEEN v. APPELLATE DIVISION

Respondent’s Supplemental Brief

14 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Birks

    19 Cal.4th 108 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 991 times
    Holding that criminal defendant has no unilateral entitlement to instructions on lesser offenses which are not necessarily included in the charge

  2. People v. Rosas

    191 Cal.App.4th 107 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 62 times
    In Rosas, supra, 191 Cal.App.4th 107, the court addressed the authority of a trial judge to consider restitution fines on remand for resentencing.

  3. In re Michael G

    44 Cal.3d 283 (Cal. 1988)   Cited 90 times
    Construing the statute in order to avoid the constitutional question whether the legislature could constitutionally override the court's fundamental contempt power

  4. In re Buckley

    10 Cal.3d 237 (Cal. 1973)   Cited 100 times
    Upholding attorney's contempt citation for remarking that the "court obviously doesn't want to apply the law"

  5. Obrien v. Jones

    23 Cal.4th 40 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 29 times
    Upholding a statutory appointment mechanism authorizing the Legislature to appoint two and the Governor to appoint one of the five members of the State Bar Court, concluding it was subject to sufficient judicially controlled protective measures so as to insure that such appointments do not impair the Supreme Court's primary and ultimate authority over the attorney admission and discipline process, thus not violating the separation of powers provision

  6. People v. Simpson

    223 Cal.App.4th Supp. 6 (Cal. Super. 2014)   Cited 8 times
    Dealing with amendments to a complaint alleging driving infractions

  7. People v. Witt

    53 Cal.App.3d 154 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding defendants were not prejudiced by late amendment of the information where "there were no new legal issues created by the amendment, and there was in reality no dispute whatsoever that [defendants] had testified in accordance with the new allegations"

  8. People v. Municipal Court

    27 Cal.App.3d 193 (Cal. Ct. App. 1972)   Cited 61 times
    Noting that portions of Pol. Code, § 4153 were later recodified in certain Gov. Code sections

  9. People v. Valles

    197 Cal.App.2d 362 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)   Cited 18 times
    In People v. Valles (1961) 197 Cal.App.2d 362 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 204], where the defendant failed to respond to the police officer's knock on his door, and the police officer had reasonable cause to believe that defendant was in the room and broke in, it was held that the officer's failure to comply with the formal requirements of section 844 was excused and that such failure did not justify exclusion of the evidence obtained by the officer in the room.

  10. In re Shortridge

    99 Cal. 526 (Cal. 1893)   Cited 53 times
    Distinguishing American and English law on this point

  11. Section 3

    Cal. Const. art. III § 3   Cited 403 times
    Guaranteeing the separation of powers of the legislative and judicial branches

  12. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or

  13. Rule 8.1110 - Partial publication

    Cal. R. 8.1110   Cited 2,324 times

    (a)Order for partial publication A majority of the rendering court may certify for publication any part of an opinion meeting a standard for publication under rule 8.1105. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Opinion contents The published part of the opinion must specify the part or parts not certified for publication. All material, factual and legal, including the disposition, that aids in the application or interpretation of the published part must be published. (c) Construction For

  14. Rule 8.1105 - Publication of appellate opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1105   Cited 2,085 times

    (a)Supreme Court All opinions of the Supreme Court are published in the Official Reports. (b)Courts of Appeal and appellate divisions Except as provided in (e), an opinion of a Court of Appeal or a superior court appellate division is published in the Official Reports if a majority of the rendering court certifies the opinion for publication before the decision is final in that court. (Subd (b) amended effective July 23, 2008; adopted effective April 1, 2007.) (c)Standards for certification An opinion