12 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,722 times   601 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
  2. Rent-A-Ctr. v. Jackson

    561 U.S. 63 (2010)   Cited 2,575 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an arbitration provision is severable from the remainder of the contract," even where the contract containing the arbitration provision is itself an arbitration agreement (quoting Buckeye , 546 U.S. at 445, 126 S.Ct. 1204 )
  3. Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna

    546 U.S. 440 (2006)   Cited 1,960 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing necessarily prevents a court from finding an arbitration clause unenforceable in a contract that it later finds is enforceable
  4. Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Intr.

    559 U.S. 662 (2010)   Cited 1,655 times   210 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prudential ripeness argument was waived
  5. Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. Casarotto

    517 U.S. 681 (1996)   Cited 1,852 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that Montana's first-page notice requirement, which governs not ‘any contract,’ but specifically and solely contracts ‘subject to arbitration,’ conflicts with the FAA and is therefore displaced by the federal measure."
  6. Perry v. Thomas

    482 U.S. 483 (1987)   Cited 1,326 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the FAA preempted a state statute permitting litigation of wage collection actions despite the existence of a private agreement to arbitrate
  7. Preston v. Ferrer

    552 U.S. 346 (2008)   Cited 568 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the FAA preempted a California law giving a state agency primary jurisdiction over a dispute involving the California Talent Agency Act despite the parties' agreement to arbitrate such disputes
  8. Discover Bank v. Superior Court

    36 Cal.4th 148 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 476 times   70 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under some circumstances, class action waivers in consumer arbitration agreements are unconscionable
  9. Broughton v. Cigna Healthplans of California

    21 Cal.4th 1066 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 245 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim for public injunctive relief under California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) is not arbitrable, although damages claims under the CLRA are arbitrable
  10. Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.

    30 Cal.4th 303 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 176 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that public injunction claims pursuant to California's Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law are not arbitrable