49 Cited authorities

  1. Waller v. Truck Ins. Exchange, Inc.

    11 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 1,228 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, when extrinsic facts eliminate the potential for coverage, an insurer may decline to defend even if the complaint had suggested potential liability
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior Court

    2 Cal.4th 1254 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,075 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that policy terms must be read in their "ordinary and popular sense"
  3. Buss v. Superior Court

    16 Cal.4th 35 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 537 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an insurer may seek reimbursement of defense costs that may be allocated to claims that are not even potentially covered because a party desiring relief carries the burden of proof
  4. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    98 N.Y.2d 208 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 335 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indemnity should be allocated pro rata
  5. Shade Foods v. Innovative Products Sales Mktg

    78 Cal.App.4th 847 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 285 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding presence of wood splinters in almonds caused "property damage" within meaning of commercial general liability policy when contaminated almonds were incorporated into nut clusters and cereal products
  6. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co.

    10 Cal.4th 645 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 320 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rules of construction applicable to contracts generally also govern insurance contracts
  7. Cole v. Celotex Corp.

    599 So. 2d 1058 (La. 1992)   Cited 313 times
    Holding that policy coverage is triggered in each year that the plaintiff inhaled asbestos
  8. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Superior Court

    24 Cal.4th 945 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 205 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding duty to indemnify for damages is limited to "money ordered by a court"
  9. Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America

    667 F.2d 1034 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 323 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that insurance coverage in the context of asbestos-related diseases is triggered by exposure, exposure in residence, and manifestation
  10. American Physicians Ins. Exchange v. Garcia

    876 S.W.2d 842 (Tex. 1994)   Cited 223 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. Garcia, 876 S.W.2d 842 (Tex. 1994), the Texas Supreme Court adopted an "anti-stacking rule" that prohibits an insured from stacking the coverage limits of multiple, consecutive policies when "a single claim involving indivisible injury" extends across several distinct policy periods.
  11. Section 15

    Cal. Ins. Code § 15   Cited 13 times

    "City" includes "city and county." Ca. Ins. Code § 15

  12. Rule 8.1105 - Publication of appellate opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1105   Cited 1,511 times

    (a)Supreme Court All opinions of the Supreme Court are published in the Official Reports. (b)Courts of Appeal and appellate divisions Except as provided in (e), an opinion of a Court of Appeal or a superior court appellate division is published in the Official Reports if a majority of the rendering court certifies the opinion for publication before the decision is final in that court. (Subd (b) amended effective July 23, 2008; adopted effective April 1, 2007.) (c)Standards for certification An opinion