221 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 135,516 times   173 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prejudice for IAC claims requires showing "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different"
  2. United States v. Booker

    543 U.S. 220 (2005)   Cited 22,824 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory
  3. Apprendi v. New Jersey

    530 U.S. 466 (2000)   Cited 22,056 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
  4. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 14,695 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"
  5. Blakely v. Washington

    542 U.S. 296 (2004)   Cited 14,134 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[w]hen a judge inflicts punishment that the jury's verdict alone does not allow, the jury has not found all the facts ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment,’ and the judge exceeds his proper authority”
  6. Jackson v. Virginia

    443 U.S. 307 (1979)   Cited 70,205 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court must presume trier of fact resolved all inferences in favor of the prosecution "even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record"
  7. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 52,767 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a suspect "must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation"
  8. Batson v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 79 (1986)   Cited 13,604 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes
  9. Ring v. Arizona

    536 U.S. 584 (2002)   Cited 4,626 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[i]f a State makes an increase in a defendant's authorized punishment contingent on the finding of a fact, that fact—no matter how the State labels it—must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt”
  10. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 33,166 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution"
  11. Section 352

    Cal. Evid. Code § 352   Cited 7,444 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Giving a trial court discretion to exclude evidence "if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury"
  12. Section 1043

    Cal. Evid. Code § 1043   Cited 770 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) In any case in which discovery or disclosure is sought of peace or custodial officer personnel records or records maintained pursuant to Section 832.5 of the Penal Code or information from those records, the party seeking the discovery or disclosure shall file a written motion with the appropriate court or administrative body upon written notice to the governmental agency that has custody and control of the records, as follows: (1) In a civil action, the written notice shall be given at the times

  13. Section 702

    Cal. Evid. Code § 702   Cited 287 times
    Qualifying as an expert witness